arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Beyond Self-Knowledge: Propagating Uncertainty Across Reasoning and Retrieval in LLMs

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Information Retrieval

arXiv:2607.25600 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Jul 2026]

Title:Beyond Self-Knowledge: Propagating Uncertainty Across Reasoning and Retrieval in LLMs

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Self-Knowledge: Propagating Uncertainty Across Reasoning and Retrieval in LLMs, by Chandan Kumar Sah and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Retrieval-augmented generation improves knowledge-intensive question answering, but indiscriminate retrieval can introduce irrelevant evidence and unnecessary computation. We investigate whether verbalized confidence from black-box language models can serve as an actionable signal for retrieval routing. Our method, BeyondUncertainty, first elicits a structured provisional answer and confidence estimate, then applies a model-specific threshold selected on held-out validation data and frozen before test evaluation. Low-confidence questions receive top-$5$ TF--IDF retrieval followed by a second answer call, whereas high-confidence questions return the provisional answer directly. We evaluate 27,000 policy instances across six QA benchmarks, three model families, and three retrieval policies. BeyondUncertainty achieves $0.483$ mean token-level F1, compared with $0.467$ for always retrieval and $0.401$ for no retrieval, while reducing retrieved passages by $20.4\%$ relative to always retrieval. When matched on the number of questions routed to retrieval within each dataset--model cell, it outperforms a post-hoc random allocation in 17 of 18 settings, with an average gain of 0.024 F1. Although poorly calibrated as an absolute probability, probe uncertainty modestly predicts question-level retrieval benefit (AUROC $=0.628$). However, the additional probe increases total token usage by $28.2\%$, revealing a trade-off between more selective evidence acquisition and end-to-end token efficiency.
Comments: 9 pages, 6 figures, 6 tables
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.25600 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:2607.25600v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.25600
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Chandan Kumar Sah [view email]
[v1] Tue, 28 Jul 2026 11:30:25 UTC (671 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Self-Knowledge: Propagating Uncertainty Across Reasoning and Retrieval in LLMs, by Chandan Kumar Sah and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.IR
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language