arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

Truncated Step-Level Sampling with Process Rewards for Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2602.23440 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Feb 2026 (v1), last revised 9 Jul 2026 (this version, v4)]

Title:Truncated Step-Level Sampling with Process Rewards for Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning

View a PDF of the paper titled Truncated Step-Level Sampling with Process Rewards for Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning, by Chris Samarinas and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Reinforcement learning has emerged as an effective paradigm for training large language models to interleave reasoning with search engine calls. However, existing approaches face a fundamental credit assignment problem: methods like Search-R1 assign a single outcome reward to the entire multi-step trajectory, providing no signal about which reasoning or retrieval decisions were responsible for success or failure. Process-reward methods such as StepSearch introduce step-level supervision but still sample complete trajectories independently, so advantage estimates at any given step are contaminated by the randomness of all other steps. We propose SLATE (Step-Level Advantage estimation for Truncated Exploration), which addresses both problems through two complementary ideas. First, truncated step-level sampling generates k continuations from a shared prefix, isolating all variation to a single decision point. We prove this reduces the variance of advantage estimates by up to a factor of T compared to full-trajectory sampling for T-step trajectories, the first formal variance guarantee for step-level RL in retrieval-augmented reasoning. Second, dense, decomposed process rewards separately evaluate reasoning quality, query quality, and answer correctness on a ternary scale via an LLM judge, providing richer supervision than binary outcome signals or heuristic step-level scores. Experiments on seven QA benchmarks show that SLATE consistently outperforms both sparse-reward and process-reward baselines, achieving a 7.0% relative improvement over Search-R1 on the 7B model and 30.7% on the 3B model. Gains are largest on challenging multi-hop tasks, and ablations confirm that truncated sampling and dense rewards provide complementary benefits.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Information Retrieval (cs.IR)
Cite as: arXiv:2602.23440 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2602.23440v4 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2602.23440
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Chris Samarinas [view email]
[v1] Thu, 26 Feb 2026 19:05:40 UTC (11,424 KB)
[v2] Thu, 12 Mar 2026 08:08:08 UTC (11,426 KB)
[v3] Wed, 1 Apr 2026 03:20:32 UTC (11,428 KB)
[v4] Thu, 9 Jul 2026 12:47:01 UTC (11,432 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Truncated Step-Level Sampling with Process Rewards for Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning, by Chris Samarinas and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language