arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

A Comparative Study on Affective Cues in Text Embeddings Across Psychological Emotion Theories

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.29068 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 Jun 2026]

Title:A Comparative Study on Affective Cues in Text Embeddings Across Psychological Emotion Theories

View a PDF of the paper titled A Comparative Study on Affective Cues in Text Embeddings Across Psychological Emotion Theories, by Fabio Ciani and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Text encoders are known for their utility in natural language processing, as they are able to efficiently compress inputs into dense vectors while preserving semantics. These models have been applied to affective computing, in particular to help with solving sentiment analysis and emotion recognition tasks. Nevertheless, it remains unclear to what extent the latent representations produced by modern text encoders capture well-defined psychological theories of affect. In this work, we investigate the affective capabilities of twelve recently released text encoders by probing their generated embeddings as input features for solving regression and classification tasks across three established emotion frameworks, using both word- and sentence-level data. Additionally, we apply a semantic data-leakage prevention technique to improve robustness in word-level evaluations. Our main findings show that the latent manifolds of the latest instruction-aware open-weight encoders enclose an equal or even a larger amount of affective information in comparison with proprietary counterparts when evaluated at word level. In contrast, embeddings of task-tuned and proprietary encoders reach the highest scores on sentence-level affective classification. Furthermore, a qualitative analysis of latent representations and their encoded affective cues is provided.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: I.2.7; I.5.4; I.5.2; J.4; H.1.2
Cite as: arXiv:2606.29068 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.29068v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.29068
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Fabio Ciani [view email]
[v1] Sat, 27 Jun 2026 20:09:05 UTC (298 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled A Comparative Study on Affective Cues in Text Embeddings Across Psychological Emotion Theories, by Fabio Ciani and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language