arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Evaluating RAG Metrics in Applied Contexts: An Experiment, Its Findings and Its Limitations

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.07302 (cs)
[Submitted on 8 Jul 2026]

Title:Evaluating RAG Metrics in Applied Contexts: An Experiment, Its Findings and Its Limitations

View a PDF of the paper titled Evaluating RAG Metrics in Applied Contexts: An Experiment, Its Findings and Its Limitations, by Quentin Brabant
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:This paper reports an empirical study evaluating the relevance of several RAG metrics. The experiment is based on a question-answering dataset created by human annotators from business data. The generated responses and retrieved spans of a RAG system are scored using evaluation metrics from four libraries (Ragas, DeepEval, RAGChecker, Opik). These metrics are compared to scores given by two evaluators, as well as to standard metrics such as recall. An analysis of correlations is conducted. Finally, we highlight certain limitations of our methodology, compare it to those used in the literature, and suggest some avenues for future research. This paper is an English translation of a paper originally published in the French-speaking workshop EvalLLM (Brabant, 2026).
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.07302 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.07302v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.07302
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Quentin Brabant [view email]
[v1] Wed, 8 Jul 2026 11:44:28 UTC (16 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language