Evaluating Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Translation Error Detection:An English--Greek Contrastive Study
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Evaluating Multilingual Sentence Embeddings for Translation Error Detection:An English--Greek Contrastive Study
Abstract:Multilingual sentence embeddings are increasingly used to estimate semantic similarity across languages, yet their sensitivity to fine-grained translation errors remains insufficiently understood. This study investigates whether general-purpose multilingual embedding models can distinguish correct English-Greek translations from minimally modified erroneous alternatives. A contrastive dataset was developed from FLORES+ sentence-aligned reference translations and reviewed by two translation experts. It contains 1,850 examples across ten core and five exploratory error categories, covering factual, lexical-semantic, grammatical, relational, referential, and discourse-level phenomena.
Five multilingual sentence-embedding models (BGE-M3, Multilingual E5, Multilingual MPNet, LaBSE, and Jina Embeddings v3) were evaluated using cosine similarity between each English source sentence and its correct and erroneous Greek translations. A reference-free COMETKiwi model was also evaluated as an MT quality-estimation baseline. Performance was assessed through contrastive accuracy and score margins for category-specific sensitivity. BGE-M3 achieved the highest accuracy among embedding models at 89.30 percent, while COMETKiwi achieved 94.49 percent. Embedding models detected explicit factual and lexical changes more reliably than tense-and-aspect and pronoun-coreference errors. COMETKiwi improved performance on several difficult categories, including tense and aspect, pronoun and coreference, and semantic-role errors, but showed lower sensitivity to date-and-time errors and underperformed the embedding models on numbers. The results show complementary error-sensitivity profiles: multilingual sentence embeddings provide useful semantic adequacy signals but are better suited as components of broader translation-evaluation frameworks than as standalone metrics.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.28776 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.28776v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28776
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Manolis Gergatsoulis [view email][v1] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 18:32:54 UTC (33 KB)
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Evaluating Large Language Models for Forced Outage Risk Prediction: Benefits and Comparison to Machine Learning
Sep 7
-
SharedSAE: One Feature Dictionary Across Language Models
Sep 7
-
Conformity Breaks Conformal Prediction
Sep 7
-
When Load-Balancing Goes Too Far: Expert Pruning in Over-Dispersed Mixture-of-Experts Models
Sep 7
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.