Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents
Abstract:An LLM producing the response pattern associated with a human psychological effect is not the same claim as the LLM possessing that bias. We present PsyAgentBench, a benchmark that re-runs classic psychology experiments on LLM agents under a factorial design built to separate these: each paradigm is run with the paradigm explicitly labeled in the prompt (named) or framed as a routine task (blind), and on the literal textbook version of the task (canonical) or a structurally matched variant written to reduce lexical and scenario overlap with likely training data (counterfactual), crossed with a persona manipulation. Across five completed paradigms, evaluated on up to three open-weight model families with 41,904 trials released, apparently human-like effects arise through qualitatively different routes rather than one susceptibility: paradigm-label gating with explicit override (Asch conformity, 0 percent blind to 83.3 percent named on gpt-oss-120B), knowledge-dependent signal reliance (anchoring, exactly zero on grounded facts versus near total on invented quantities, a pattern equally consistent with rational use of the only available signal), amplification on novel content under labeling (framing), robust absence (sunk cost), and safety-mediated selection where refusal itself is the primary finding (minimal-group allocation). A one-sentence persona change (agreeableness, framed as an instruction rather than a verified trait manipulation) eliminates, dampens, or reverses these effects depending on which effect it is, arguing against any single response-bias account. We further formalize, and in two cases document empirically, three ways a psychology paradigm can fail to port to LLM agents: persona dominance, population collapse, and safety selection. We argue scalar bias-susceptibility scores obscure this structure and report replication profiles instead.
| Comments: | 13 pages, 1 figure, 8 tables |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.7; I.2.11; J.4 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.22090 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.22090v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22090
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Memory That Looks Forward: A Zero-Inference Prospective Term for Personal Memory Retrieval
Sep 22
-
Summarize, Judge, Refine: Decoupled Content Understanding and Policy Learning for Multimodal Content Moderation
Sep 22
-
AI-inferred expressed well-being and collective-action discourse in climate-change campaigns on X
Sep 22
-
Token Signatures of Code: Comparing Coding Behaviors Across Large Language Models
Sep 22
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.