arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.22090 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Jul 2026]

Title:Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents

Authors:Joy Bose
View a PDF of the paper titled Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents, by Joy Bose
View PDF
Abstract:An LLM producing the response pattern associated with a human psychological effect is not the same claim as the LLM possessing that bias. We present PsyAgentBench, a benchmark that re-runs classic psychology experiments on LLM agents under a factorial design built to separate these: each paradigm is run with the paradigm explicitly labeled in the prompt (named) or framed as a routine task (blind), and on the literal textbook version of the task (canonical) or a structurally matched variant written to reduce lexical and scenario overlap with likely training data (counterfactual), crossed with a persona manipulation. Across five completed paradigms, evaluated on up to three open-weight model families with 41,904 trials released, apparently human-like effects arise through qualitatively different routes rather than one susceptibility: paradigm-label gating with explicit override (Asch conformity, 0 percent blind to 83.3 percent named on gpt-oss-120B), knowledge-dependent signal reliance (anchoring, exactly zero on grounded facts versus near total on invented quantities, a pattern equally consistent with rational use of the only available signal), amplification on novel content under labeling (framing), robust absence (sunk cost), and safety-mediated selection where refusal itself is the primary finding (minimal-group allocation). A one-sentence persona change (agreeableness, framed as an instruction rather than a verified trait manipulation) eliminates, dampens, or reverses these effects depending on which effect it is, arguing against any single response-bias account. We further formalize, and in two cases document empirically, three ways a psychology paradigm can fail to port to LLM agents: persona dominance, population collapse, and safety selection. We argue scalar bias-susceptibility scores obscure this structure and report replication profiles instead.
Comments: 13 pages, 1 figure, 8 tables
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
ACM classes: I.2.7; I.2.11; J.4
Cite as: arXiv:2609.22090 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.22090v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.22090
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Joy Bose [view email]
[v1] Thu, 23 Jul 2026 10:34:06 UTC (339 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Recognition, Simulation, and Refusal: A Contamination-Aware Study of Classic Psychological Effects in LLM Agents, by Joy Bose
  • View PDF

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language