arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Do we need to answer that question? Salience and Answerability of Potential Questions in Naturalistic Dialogue

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.31130 (cs)
[Submitted on 25 Sep 2026]

Title:Do we need to answer that question? Salience and Answerability of Potential Questions in Naturalistic Dialogue

Authors:Amandine Decker (LORIA, UL, CNRS, SEMAGRAMME, GU), Maxime Amblard (SEMAGRAMME, LORIA), Ellen Breitholtz (GU)
View a PDF of the paper titled Do we need to answer that question? Salience and Answerability of Potential Questions in Naturalistic Dialogue, by Amandine Decker (LORIA and 7 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:We empirically investigate Question Under Discussion based modelling in naturalistic dialogue by studying whether the salience of generated potential questions predicts their subsequent resolution. Building on Wu et al. (2024), we construct a dataset of 7,124 questions automatically generated from utterances and preceding context from the British National Corpus, and annotated for salience and answerability. We find a robust but low positive correlation between salience and answerability in dialogue, indicating that more salient questions are more likely to be addressed. However, this effect is markedly weaker than in monologic text, suggesting that conversational structure is less predictable. We further observe that structured interactions exhibit stronger alignment between annotators than less organised dialogues.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.31130 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.31130v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.31130
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
Journal reference: SEMDIAL 2026 - 30th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Sep 2026, Loughborough, United Kingdom

Submission history

From: Amandine Decker [view email] [via CCSD proxy]
[v1] Fri, 25 Sep 2026 11:23:45 UTC (1,284 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Do we need to answer that question? Salience and Answerability of Potential Questions in Naturalistic Dialogue, by Amandine Decker (LORIA and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language