Auditing and Repairing LLM-as-Judge Failures in a Production Text-to-SQL Pipeline
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Auditing and Repairing LLM-as-Judge Failures in a Production Text-to-SQL Pipeline
Abstract:Production text-to-SQL pipelines often end with an LLM-as-judge whose agreement with human annotators has never actually been measured. When we checked ours, the deployed gpt-4o-mini judge agreed with two-author gold at only Cohen's kappa = 0.04 on a disagreement-enriched set and 0.42 on a uniform-random spot-check, over-flagging 77.1% of the human-FAITHFUL cases in the enriched set. Most of its over-flags trace back to a single mechanism we call GRADE-HALLUCINATION. A self-hosted Qwen3.6-27B replacement (kappa = 0.72) lands in the same range as Claude Opus 4.7 (kappa = 0.71); the head-to-head is underpowered at n = 96, but for the deployment decision that hardly matters, since Qwen costs roughly 1/300 as much per call. Ensembling does not help for free. Pairing the weak judge with a stronger one degrades agreement, whereas three strong judges under unanimity routing reach kappa = 0.79 at 89.7% auto-coverage. Applied out-of-domain, the same audit recipe flags 25.5% of BIRD-financial's expert-authored gold SQLs as candidate gold-SQL issues under our annotation protocol. Code and pre-registration are at this https URL.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.30290 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.30290v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30290
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bookmark
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
A Mechanistic Study of AI-Text Detection Neurons in Frozen BERT: Sparse Probing and Activation Patching on RAID
Sep 28
-
Manifold Projection and Iterative Autoencoder Refinement for Masked Language Modeling
Sep 28
-
Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents
Sep 28
-
A Survey on Fake Review Detection: From Pre-trained Language Models to Large Language Models
Sep 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.