Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Not All Memories Are Equal: Hierarchical Collaborative Memory for Validity-Aware Retrieval in LLM Agents
Abstract:In team collaboration scenarios, memory is heterogeneous and continually evolving. Team memories capture collective decisions, protocols, and current consensus, while individual memories preserve member-specific observations, execution traces, and intermediate progress. Existing memory-augmented systems typically retrieve from all stored memories as a flat pool, ranking them by semantic relevance, importance, or recency without modeling hierarchical structure or evolving validity. As a result, they often surface semantically relevant but outdated or conflicting memories, especially individual memories that no longer align with current team consensus, instead of prioritizing currently valid memories. This is particularly problematic when collaborative LLM agents answer user questions, since their responses should be grounded in valid memories. We propose HiCoMER, a framework for hierarchical collaborative memory management and validity-aware retrieval in LLM agents. HiCoMER first maintains the validity of team and individual memories and then retrieves memories that remain valid, rather than retrieving directly from all stored memories. It consists of three components: a Hierarchical Memory Conflict Updater, a Validity-Aware Memory Retriever, and a Memory-Grounded Answer Generator. To evaluate HiCoMER, we construct two new datasets for memory-grounded question answering in collaborative settings. Experiments on both datasets show that HiCoMER consistently outperforms strong baselines by reducing outdated retrieval, preserving current team consensus, and improving downstream QA quality.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2609.30289 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2609.30289v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.30289
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
A Mechanistic Study of AI-Text Detection Neurons in Frozen BERT: Sparse Probing and Activation Patching on RAID
Sep 28
-
Manifold Projection and Iterative Autoencoder Refinement for Masked Language Modeling
Sep 28
-
Auditing and Repairing LLM-as-Judge Failures in a Production Text-to-SQL Pipeline
Sep 28
-
A Survey on Fake Review Detection: From Pre-trained Language Models to Large Language Models
Sep 28
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.