Sixteen models, fewer than two voices: measuring ensemble dispersion where no answer is uniquely correct
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Sixteen models, fewer than two voices: measuring ensemble dispersion where no answer is uniquely correct
Abstract:Sixteen language models drawn from ten families produced, on average, the semantic diversity of 1.69 distinct formulations of a psychotherapeutic case, against a single-model baseline of 1.43 from one model's own runs. Ensembles place more than one reading before a decision-maker on the premise that several models supply several perspectives. Dispersion over their outputs is measured both as diversity and as uncertainty, and both traditions validate it against a correctness criterion that this task does not admit. Measuring diversity is a solved problem: the Vendi Score, the exponential of the von Neumann entropy of a similarity matrix, is an effective number of distinct elements. What a single aggregate does not say is where the diversity comes from. We define a per-model dissent contribution, the complement of a model's mean similarity to the other members of its ensemble: a magnitude from the same matrix, not a decomposition of the spectral index, whose maximum identifies the most divergent voice. Crossing model and case, we test as a preregistered hypothesis whether model identity accounts for a non-zero share of the variance in dissent, and characterise the structure that test detects. The panel formulated fifteen stratified vignettes, yielding 7,082 formulations for analysis. Model identity was a detectable structuring factor of the dissent that remained, but the usual categories recovered it only partly: scale differences pointed in opposite directions across pairs, family grouped models on only five two-member lines, and the most divergent voice changed with panel composition, so that the surfaced outlier describes the ensemble rather than the model. Dissent did not track the interpretive openness for which the case bank was stratified; it was organised by clinical content instead, leaving the dispersion an ensemble produces a property to measure rather than assume.
| Comments: | 34 pages (25 article + 9 supplementary), 3 figures. Supplementary material (S1-S11) included. Preregistered at OSF (this http URL), sealed 21 July 2026. Analysis code and data: this https URL |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI) |
| ACM classes: | I.2.7; I.2.6; G.3 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.00285 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.00285v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.00285
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Unified Hallucination Fuzzing for Multimodal Large Language Models
Aug 11
-
DocAtlas: Long-Document Understanding as Mutable-State Interaction
Aug 11
-
WuYuEval: A Multi-Level Benchmark for Large Language Models in Solid Waste Management
Aug 11
-
Search-G1: Grounded Search Agents via Representation-Based Intrinsic Rewards
Aug 11
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.