arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Entity Binding Failures in Speech LLM Reasoning: Diagnosis and Chain-of-Thought Intervention

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.04474 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Jun 2026]

Title:Entity Binding Failures in Speech LLM Reasoning: Diagnosis and Chain-of-Thought Intervention

View a PDF of the paper titled Entity Binding Failures in Speech LLM Reasoning: Diagnosis and Chain-of-Thought Intervention, by Ming-Hao Hsu and 3 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Speech Large Language Models (SLLMs) underperform their text counterparts on complex reasoning. We reveal that this modality gap is not a uniform cognitive deficit. Evaluating three diverse SLLMs, we show speech-to-text (S2T) matches or exceeds text-to-text (T2T) on spatial, syntactic, and factual tasks. However, on logical tasks requiring entity tracking, S2T accuracy collapses to chance. We diagnose this localized degradation as an entity binding failure: continuous speech features cause models to lose precise entity-property associations during implicit reasoning. To resolve this, we propose Entity-Aware Chain-of-Thought (EA-CoT), forcing SLLMs to explicitly enumerate entities and bind them to claims before reasoning. Strikingly, EA-CoT bridges the gap, even when spoken names are misrecognized, yielding up to a 24.4% absolute accuracy improvement. Ablations confirm these gains stem entirely from explicit semantic binding, reframing the gap as a resolvable bottleneck.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Audio and Speech Processing (eess.AS)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.04474 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.04474v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.04474
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ming-Hao Hsu [view email]
[v1] Wed, 3 Jun 2026 05:44:09 UTC (73 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Entity Binding Failures in Speech LLM Reasoning: Diagnosis and Chain-of-Thought Intervention, by Ming-Hao Hsu and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language