arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

Transplanting, inverting, and preventing a misalignment persona: method-conditional emergent misalignment in Qwen2.5

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.04510 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Jul 2026]

Title:Transplanting, inverting, and preventing a misalignment persona: method-conditional emergent misalignment in Qwen2.5

Authors:Lyndon Drake (University of Oxford), Zandi Eberstadt (University of Oxford)
View a PDF of the paper titled Transplanting, inverting, and preventing a misalignment persona: method-conditional emergent misalignment in Qwen2.5, by Lyndon Drake (University of Oxford) and Zandi Eberstadt (University of Oxford)
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Emergent misalignment (EM) -- the broad misbehaviour a language model acquires after fine-tuning on narrow harmful data -- is mediated in Qwen2.5 models by a latent persona direction, and that direction is causal in open weights. Transplanting it into a model that shares only pretraining with its source induces broad EM (2.83 +/- 0.26% misaligned against a random-direction floor of ~1.1%), and ablating a model's own direction roughly halves an overt inducer's broadcast (21% to 10%). The transplant doubles as a measurement method, causally assaying directions that a source model represents but cannot itself express. Whether a fine-tune recruits this persona depends on method and capacity, and since low-rank PEFT is the cheaper regime at scale, the recruiting method is also the economical one. On Qwen2.5-32B, low-rank LoRA on insecure code recruits it (3.4% misaligned) while full SFT on identical data does not (0.3%) and moves against the persona axis (drift-persona cosine +0.17 at rank 1 to -0.10), the far-inducer, high-capacity exception consistent with a representational-distance x capacity account. The persona's causal role is itself conditional. Steering a bad-medical SFT run away from the direction during training raises the broadcast from 24% to 51% while a matched random control lowers it, so removing the direction is no blanket recipe. Because recruitment is a loss-reducing shortcut that capacity renders redundant, it can be screened for and prevented in the tested instances. Persona loss-relevance at the SFT solution orders four inducers' broadcasts rank-perfectly within Qwen2.5, inoculation removes recruitment selectively (4.75% to 0.0%, code coherence 65% to 87%), and fine-tuning orthogonal to the single behaviour-derived axis reduces it persona-specifically. Results are a controlled case study of one model family, single-seed in places.
Comments: 34 pages, 18 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: I.2.6; I.2.7
Cite as: arXiv:2607.04510 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.04510v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.04510
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Lyndon Drake [view email]
[v1] Sun, 5 Jul 2026 21:23:15 UTC (275 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Transplanting, inverting, and preventing a misalignment persona: method-conditional emergent misalignment in Qwen2.5, by Lyndon Drake (University of Oxford) and Zandi Eberstadt (University of Oxford)
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language