arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 4 min read

LMEB: Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2603.12572 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Mar 2026 (v1), last revised 24 Jul 2026 (this version, v5)]

Title:LMEB: Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark

View a PDF of the paper titled LMEB: Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark, by Xinping Zhao and 11 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Memory embeddings are crucial for memory-augmented systems, such as OpenClaw, but their evaluation is underexplored in current text embedding benchmarks, which narrowly focus on traditional passage retrieval and fail to assess models' ability to handle long-horizon memory retrieval tasks involving fragmented, context-dependent, and temporally distant information. To address this gap, we introduce the Long-horizon Memory Embedding Benchmark (LMEB), a comprehensive framework for evaluating embedding models on complex, long-horizon memory retrieval. LMEB comprises 22 datasets and 193 zero-shot retrieval tasks spanning four memory types: episodic, dialogue, semantic, and procedural. These memory types differ in terms of level of abstraction and temporal dependency, capturing distinct aspects of memory retrieval that reflect the diverse challenges of the real world. We evaluate 15 widely used embedding models, ranging from hundreds of millions to ten billion parameters. The results reveal that (1) LMEB provides a reasonable level of difficulty; (2) Larger models do not always perform better; (3) LMEB and MTEB measure orthogonal capabilities. This suggests that the field has yet to converge on a universal model capable of excelling across all memory retrieval tasks, and that strong performance on traditional passage retrieval does not necessarily transfer to long-horizon memory retrieval. LMEB provides a standardized and reproducible framework that fills a key gap in memory embedding evaluation and supports future advances in long-term, context-dependent retrieval.
Comments: 35 pages, 9 figures, 23 tables
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2603.12572 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2603.12572v5 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2603.12572
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Xinping Zhao [view email]
[v1] Fri, 13 Mar 2026 02:09:57 UTC (4,949 KB)
[v2] Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:27 UTC (4,949 KB)
[v3] Thu, 7 May 2026 10:46:20 UTC (4,857 KB)
[v4] Mon, 13 Jul 2026 08:03:45 UTC (4,857 KB)
[v5] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 02:07:03 UTC (4,857 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language