arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Where Privacy Risk Lives in English-Source Multilingual RAG: A Stage-Decomposed Audit Across Five Query Languages

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.05163 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 May 2026]

Title:Where Privacy Risk Lives in English-Source Multilingual RAG: A Stage-Decomposed Audit Across Five Query Languages

View a PDF of the paper titled Where Privacy Risk Lives in English-Source Multilingual RAG: A Stage-Decomposed Audit Across Five Query Languages, by Yanhang Li and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:A common assumption holds that switching to a non-English language makes a multilingual RAG system easier to attack for personal information. We test this on an English-source synthetic-PII corpus with five query languages and a two-stage defence (LLM input judge + regex output filter), in a pipeline whose translator, judge, back-translator, and generator are all Qwen2.5-7B -- so every finding below is pipeline-conditional, not a causal ranking of language-inherent risk. Under output-only filtering, English has the highest observed unstructured-PII leak rate; only English-vs-Swahili separates cleanly under document-level bootstrap intervals. Once the input judge is added, residual leaks remain on Arabic and Swahili, and back-translating the query does not close the gap (an ablation we report but cannot use as a causal diagnostic, since the back-translator is also Qwen). On a separate n=17 multilingual-prompted-judge residual corner, attaching the gold corpus document to the input judge blocks 15/17 residual cells. We frame this last result as a mechanism diagnostic, not a deployable defence: it uses oracle retrieval, BLOCK/ALLOW rates are measured on adversarial queries only, and we measure no benign-query false-positive rate and no answer-utility cost. The supplementary material contains code, corpora, queries, and per-trial JSONLs; the priority follow-up is an independent-MT plus non-Qwen-judge replication with a native-speaker query set, scoped in the Limitations section.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.05163 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.05163v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.05163
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zhichao Fan [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 07:43:54 UTC (1,013 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Where Privacy Risk Lives in English-Source Multilingual RAG: A Stage-Decomposed Audit Across Five Query Languages, by Yanhang Li and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language