GraphRAG on Consumer Hardware: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Healthcare EHR Schema Retrieval
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2605.20815 (cs)
[Submitted on 20 May 2026]
Title:GraphRAG on Consumer Hardware: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Healthcare EHR Schema Retrieval
View a PDF of the paper titled GraphRAG on Consumer Hardware: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Healthcare EHR Schema Retrieval, by Peter Fernandes and Ria Kanjilal
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Graph-based Retrieval Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) extends retrieval-augmented generation to support structured reasoning over complex corpora, but its reliability under resource-constrained, privacy-sensitive deployments remains unclear. In healthcare, where Electronic Health Record (EHR) data is complex and strictly regulated, reliance on cloud-based large language models (LLMs) introduces challenges in cost, latency, and compliance. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of GraphRAG for EHR schema retrieval using locally deployed open-source LLMs. We implement the Microsoft GraphRAG pipeline on real-world EHR schema documentation and benchmark four models, including Llama 3.1 (8B), Mistral (7B), Qwen 2.5 (7B), and Phi-4-mini (3.8B), each deployed via Ollama on a single consumer GPU (8 GB VRAM). We evaluate indexing efficiency, knowledge graph construction, query latency, answer quality, and hallucination under both global and local retrieval modes. Our results reveal substantial differences: Llama 3.1 produces the richest knowledge graph (1,172 entities), Qwen 2.5 achieves the best answer quality (3.3/5), Phi-4-mini fails to complete the pipeline due to structured-output errors, and Mistral exhibits degenerate repetition behavior. We further show that GraphRAG exhibits a practical capacity threshold, where models below approximately 7B parameters fail to reliably produce valid structured outputs and cannot complete the pipeline. In addition, indexing and answer quality are decoupled across models, and local retrieval consistently outperforms global summarization in both latency and factual grounding, with reduced hallucination. These findings demonstrate that GraphRAG is feasible on consumer hardware while highlighting the importance of model selection and retrieval design for robust deployment in regulated settings.
| Comments: | 9 pages, 1 figure, 5 tables |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.20815 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.20815v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.20815
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled GraphRAG on Consumer Hardware: Benchmarking Local LLMs for Healthcare EHR Schema Retrieval, by Peter Fernandes and Ria Kanjilal
Current browse context:
cs.CL
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Shiny Stories, Hidden Struggles: Investigating the Representation of Disability Through the Lens of LLMs
May 21
-
Leveraging Large Language Models for Sentiment Analysis: Multi-Modal Analysis of Decentraland's MANA Token
May 21
-
Improving Quantized Model Performance in Qualitative Analysis with Multi-Pass Prompt Verification
May 21
-
Parallel LLM Reasoning for Bias-Resilient, Robust Conceptual Abstraction
May 21
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.