arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Can Classical Semantic-Extractive Summarization Be Evaluated in Hindi? A Replication Study

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.29090 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Sep 2026]

Title:Can Classical Semantic-Extractive Summarization Be Evaluated in Hindi? A Replication Study

View a PDF of the paper titled Can Classical Semantic-Extractive Summarization Be Evaluated in Hindi? A Replication Study, by Showket Ahmad Khan and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We replicate the distributional-semantics extractive summarisation method of Mohd, Jan and Shah (2020) and adapt it to Hindi, substituting a Devanagari-appropriate component at every language-specific step. The system is evaluated on two independent corpora --- the Hindi portion of XL-Sum and FIRE ILSUM 2.0 Hindi --- under a Devanagari-aware ROUGE implementation validated against the XL-Sum authors' own multilingual scorer, with all comparisons drawn as 1000-resample paired bootstraps. In its published equal-weight configuration the replicated system is significantly worse than a three-sentence lead baseline on both corpora, trailing Lead-3 by 0.042 ROUGE-1 Fon XL-Sum and by 0.265 on ILSUM. A feature ablation shows that sentenceposition is the only feature that contributes: position alone reproduces the lead baseline exactly, removing position gives the weakest configuration,and a validation-tuned weighting can at best equal Lead-3 and never exceed it. TextRank fails identically, making this a class-level rather than an implementation-level result. A selection analysis shows the remaining features steer extraction towards long, entity-dense body sentences while the references reuse the article this http URL Hindi benchmarks therefore cannot reward non-lead content selection, motivating purpose-built evaluation resources.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
ACM classes: I.2.7; H.3.1
Cite as: arXiv:2609.29090 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.29090v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.29090
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Nasrullah Sheikh [view email]
[v1] Thu, 24 Sep 2026 06:18:06 UTC (11 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Can Classical Semantic-Extractive Summarization Be Evaluated in Hindi? A Replication Study, by Showket Ahmad Khan and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language