arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Lost in Sampling: Assessing Lexical Reachability in LLMs via the Word Coverage Score (WCS)

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.27268 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 May 2026]

Title:Lost in Sampling: Assessing Lexical Reachability in LLMs via the Word Coverage Score (WCS)

View a PDF of the paper titled Lost in Sampling: Assessing Lexical Reachability in LLMs via the Word Coverage Score (WCS), by Samer Awad and 5 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Modern Large Language Models (LLMs) are often criticized for producing repetitive and homogeneous text, despite possessing vast latent vocabularies. While previous research has focused on model knowledge and training data, we investigate the role of decoding mechanics in suppressing linguistic diversity. We introduce the Word Coverage Score (WCS), a metric that quantifies the extent to which contextually appropriate human vocabulary is mathematically pruned by standard sampling filters (e.g., Top-$p$, Top-$k$, and Min-$p$). Rather than assessing static knowledge, the WCS measures the lexical survival rate of low-frequency, high-information human words as a function of sampling parameters. By auditing open-weight models on human-authored corpus fragments, we identify which logical lexical choices are rendered unreachable by the decoder, even when they reside within the probability space. Our results provide quantitative evidence that industry-standard sampling defaults act as unintended censorship mechanisms, smoothing the unique textures of human expression into a homogenized discourse. The WCS offers a rigorous framework for optimizing the trade-off between text coherence and lexical richness, providing a diagnostic tool for preserving the diversity of human language in generative models.
Comments: 15 pages, 6 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.27268 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.27268v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27268
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Javier Coronado-Blázquez [view email]
[v1] Tue, 26 May 2026 16:44:25 UTC (2,050 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Lost in Sampling: Assessing Lexical Reachability in LLMs via the Word Coverage Score (WCS), by Samer Awad and 5 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language