Hugging Face Daily Papers · · 3 min read

Does Seeing More Mean Knowing More? Mono-Anchored Advantage Normalization for Multi-Source Visual Reasoning

Mirrored from Hugging Face Daily Papers for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

An effective way for resolving conflict in multi-source visual reasoning</p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-05-27T02:13:56.844Z","author":{"_id":"667b7388580a979b703c3c2b","avatarUrl":"/avatars/15d42bf75f88f1e2ac112c98cb53bad6.svg","fullname":"Zeng","name":"AuroraZengfh","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":2,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.8792248964309692},"editors":["AuroraZengfh"],"editorAvatarUrls":["/avatars/15d42bf75f88f1e2ac112c98cb53bad6.svg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2605.25437","authors":[{"_id":"6a165281e9aa3c8e322db32d","user":{"_id":"667b7388580a979b703c3c2b","avatarUrl":"/avatars/15d42bf75f88f1e2ac112c98cb53bad6.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Zeng","user":"AuroraZengfh","type":"user","name":"AuroraZengfh"},"name":"Fanhu Zeng","status":"claimed_verified","statusLastChangedAt":"2026-05-27T07:42:07.253Z","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a165281e9aa3c8e322db32e","name":"Zhicong Luo","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a165281e9aa3c8e322db32f","name":"Zefan Wang","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a165281e9aa3c8e322db330","name":"You Li","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a165281e9aa3c8e322db331","name":"Chi Chen","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a165281e9aa3c8e322db332","name":"Maosong Sun","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-05-25T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-05-27T00:00:00.000Z","title":"Does Seeing More Mean Knowing More? Mono-Anchored Advantage Normalization for Multi-Source Visual Reasoning","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"667b7388580a979b703c3c2b","avatarUrl":"/avatars/15d42bf75f88f1e2ac112c98cb53bad6.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Zeng","user":"AuroraZengfh","type":"user","name":"AuroraZengfh"},"summary":"Visual reasoning through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has achieved remarkable progress. However, when dealing with multi-source inputs, existing approaches tend to treat them as a mere accumulation of information, lacking explicit mechanisms to distinguish whether integrating additional sources yields information gain or introduces interference. Therefore, they struggle to effectively model dynamic interaction when integrating multiple sources, particularly when they differ significantly in physical properties and semantics, e.g., infrared and depth, leading to inferior performance to mono-source reasoning when a certain source holds the dominant signal. To address this issue, we propose MARS, a novel mono-anchored multi-source reasoning framework that models each visual modality as an independent information source. Specifically, by treating mono-source rewards as dynamic anchors, our method explicitly incorporates the information gain introduced by multi-source fusion into advantage normalization and adaptively emphasizes mutual promotion between sources while suppressing potential noise or conflicts during RLVR. From theoretical analysis, our method effectively quantifies information gain introduced by multi-source integration in gradient estimation, enabling consistent modality regulation. Empirical results also show impressive 3.2% and 4.9% performance gains on GRPO and DAPO across diverse datasets, confirming effectiveness of our method.","upvotes":9,"discussionId":"6a165282e9aa3c8e322db333","githubRepo":"https://github.com/AI9Stars/MARS","githubRepoAddedBy":"user","ai_summary":"A novel mono-anchored multi-source reasoning framework that uses dynamic anchors to quantify information gain and regulate modality interactions during reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards.","ai_keywords":["reinforcement learning","visual reasoning","verifiable rewards","multi-source inputs","information gain","advantage normalization","gradient estimation","modality regulation"],"githubStars":2,"organization":{"_id":"628735cbc83a2d6ab8d14a66","name":"Tsinghua","fullname":"Tsinghua University","avatar":"https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/6c5c1441e3283e7543342e59277ea219?d=retro&size=100"}},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"667b7388580a979b703c3c2b","avatarUrl":"/avatars/15d42bf75f88f1e2ac112c98cb53bad6.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Zeng","user":"AuroraZengfh","type":"user"},{"_id":"642086ed290342c5df85662d","avatarUrl":"/avatars/915a4d7b89455ae97b8544c79286ddf8.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Chi Chen","user":"carboncoo","type":"user"},{"_id":"654f3e104c8874c64d43aafa","avatarUrl":"/avatars/00de263f98a81c52cdb321fb11b16c06.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"You Li","user":"Michael4933","type":"user"},{"_id":"65903c4aa78a277803bde77b","avatarUrl":"/avatars/061388320ccf1a66e1e99519dd426a60.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Ziyang Ding","user":"Oscar-dzy","type":"user"},{"_id":"6617600c843718c34d151de9","avatarUrl":"/avatars/22fa64949780da15e91d77387bdf1e41.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"dai","user":"daisq","type":"user"},{"_id":"6582c3cc1c4454dde6e5eb3e","avatarUrl":"/avatars/e4de12207e19a79ec424048da34ebd39.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Wang","user":"wph6","type":"user"},{"_id":"68cc3513b13e69da2105147c","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/v4F7z_mNQc6CHGIw3sdma.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"liok","user":"michaelpopo","type":"user"},{"_id":"6785c5de58328c47557dcd94","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/no-auth/QgWM1f07Srpea8ySGDVaK.png","isPro":false,"fullname":"one","user":"bigcg","type":"user"},{"_id":"688350951625a653c117e24d","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/noauth/lg7LX14oS-JgxlcSOZmm-.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"蔡静楠","user":"caijingnan","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"organization":{"_id":"628735cbc83a2d6ab8d14a66","name":"Tsinghua","fullname":"Tsinghua University","avatar":"https://www.gravatar.com/avatar/6c5c1441e3283e7543342e59277ea219?d=retro&size=100"},"markdownContentUrl":"https://huggingface.co/buckets/huggingchat/papers-content/resolve/2605/2605.25437.md"}">
Papers
arxiv:2605.25437

Does Seeing More Mean Knowing More? Mono-Anchored Advantage Normalization for Multi-Source Visual Reasoning

Published on May 25
· Submitted by
Zeng
on May 27
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

A novel mono-anchored multi-source reasoning framework that uses dynamic anchors to quantify information gain and regulate modality interactions during reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards.

AI-generated summary

Visual reasoning through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has achieved remarkable progress. However, when dealing with multi-source inputs, existing approaches tend to treat them as a mere accumulation of information, lacking explicit mechanisms to distinguish whether integrating additional sources yields information gain or introduces interference. Therefore, they struggle to effectively model dynamic interaction when integrating multiple sources, particularly when they differ significantly in physical properties and semantics, e.g., infrared and depth, leading to inferior performance to mono-source reasoning when a certain source holds the dominant signal. To address this issue, we propose MARS, a novel mono-anchored multi-source reasoning framework that models each visual modality as an independent information source. Specifically, by treating mono-source rewards as dynamic anchors, our method explicitly incorporates the information gain introduced by multi-source fusion into advantage normalization and adaptively emphasizes mutual promotion between sources while suppressing potential noise or conflicts during RLVR. From theoretical analysis, our method effectively quantifies information gain introduced by multi-source integration in gradient estimation, enabling consistent modality regulation. Empirical results also show impressive 3.2% and 4.9% performance gains on GRPO and DAPO across diverse datasets, confirming effectiveness of our method.

Community

Paper author Paper submitter about 9 hours ago

An effective way for resolving conflict in multi-source visual reasoning

Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images

· Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2605.25437
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.25437 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.25437 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2605.25437 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from Hugging Face Daily Papers