<strong>AURA: Intent-Directed Probing for Implicit-Need Surfacing in Situated LLM Agents</strong></p>\n<p>Situated queries often carry implicit needs beyond their literal wording — asking <em>\"where is Lin Wei?\"</em> may really be asking <em>\"are they free to interrupt?\"</em> Standard ReAct-style agents take such queries at face value and either miss the underlying need or over-probe with unnecessary tool calls.<br>AURA adds an <strong>IntentFrame</strong> inference step that estimates the implicit need behind a query and computes a <strong>gap score</strong> that directs tool selection — probing only when there's a genuine information gap to close.<br>On a 100-query benchmark, AURA improves coverage of implicit needs over ReAct-style baselines while significantly cutting unnecessary tool probes.<br> Code, simulator, and benchmark: <a href=\"https://github.com/innovation64/AURA\" rel=\"nofollow\">https://github.com/innovation64/AURA</a></p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-06-05T15:21:52.699Z","author":{"_id":"6350c89759bfa9a85d434138","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1666238674117-6350c89759bfa9a85d434138.jpeg","fullname":"Yang Lee","name":"innovation64","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":21,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.8387690782546997},"editors":["innovation64"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1666238674117-6350c89759bfa9a85d434138.jpeg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2606.05557","authors":[{"_id":"6a22e8f0e4c258a029491713","name":"Yang Li","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a22e8f0e4c258a029491714","name":"Jiaxiang Liu","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a22e8f0e4c258a029491715","name":"Jiang Cai","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a22e8f0e4c258a029491716","name":"Mingkun Xu","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-06-04T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-06-05T00:00:00.000Z","title":"AURA: Intent-Directed Probing for Implicit-Need Surfacing in Situated LLM Agents","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"6350c89759bfa9a85d434138","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1666238674117-6350c89759bfa9a85d434138.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Yang Lee","user":"innovation64","type":"user","name":"innovation64"},"summary":"A situated query like \"where is Lin Wei?\" often encodes more than its literal content: the user may also want to know whether Lin Wei is free, in a good mood, or worth interrupting now. Standard tool-use agents answer the literal question and stop. AURA inserts an inference step between scene perception and tool use that produces an IntentFrame: a structured estimate of the implicit need with a scalar gap score that controls per-query probe budget and tool selection. On a 100-query four-scene implicit-intent benchmark, AURA improves implicit-need coverage over ReAct-style probing (Delta = +0.07, p < 10^-6); three of four scenes are individually significant, the gain reproduces on a second backbone, and a prompt ablation attributes the lift to gap calibration rather than answer memorisation. On factual lookup the controller trades raw accuracy for 82% fewer probes and zero forbidden-tool violations on a privacy-sensitive slice; scope conditions are detailed in Limitations. Code, simulator, and benchmark are released at https://github.com/innovation64/AURA.","upvotes":1,"discussionId":"6a22e8f0e4c258a029491717","githubRepo":"https://github.com/innovation64/AURA","githubRepoAddedBy":"user","ai_summary":"AURA enhances query answering by incorporating an intent inference step that estimates implicit needs and optimizes tool usage through gap scoring, achieving better implicit-need coverage and reduced probe consumption compared to standard approaches.","ai_keywords":["IntentFrame","gap score","tool-use agents","ReAct-style probing","implicit-need coverage","probe budget","controller","gap calibration"],"ai_summary_model":"Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct","githubStars":0,"organization":{"_id":"6497e1cbe35ff69cfd9b4374","name":"gdiist2021","fullname":"Guangdong Institute of intelligent science and Technology","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/636deed9ffbe479c979d7a2f/6yMAaq3rwb_gf0FiH6lha.png"}},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"6350c89759bfa9a85d434138","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1666238674117-6350c89759bfa9a85d434138.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Yang Lee","user":"innovation64","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"organization":{"_id":"6497e1cbe35ff69cfd9b4374","name":"gdiist2021","fullname":"Guangdong Institute of intelligent science and Technology","avatar":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/636deed9ffbe479c979d7a2f/6yMAaq3rwb_gf0FiH6lha.png"},"markdownContentUrl":"https://huggingface.co/buckets/huggingchat/papers-content/resolve/2606/2606.05557.md"}">
AURA: Intent-Directed Probing for Implicit-Need Surfacing in Situated LLM Agents
Abstract
AURA enhances query answering by incorporating an intent inference step that estimates implicit needs and optimizes tool usage through gap scoring, achieving better implicit-need coverage and reduced probe consumption compared to standard approaches.
A situated query like "where is Lin Wei?" often encodes more than its literal content: the user may also want to know whether Lin Wei is free, in a good mood, or worth interrupting now. Standard tool-use agents answer the literal question and stop. AURA inserts an inference step between scene perception and tool use that produces an IntentFrame: a structured estimate of the implicit need with a scalar gap score that controls per-query probe budget and tool selection. On a 100-query four-scene implicit-intent benchmark, AURA improves implicit-need coverage over ReAct-style probing (Delta = +0.07, p < 10^-6); three of four scenes are individually significant, the gain reproduces on a second backbone, and a prompt ablation attributes the lift to gap calibration rather than answer memorisation. On factual lookup the controller trades raw accuracy for 82% fewer probes and zero forbidden-tool violations on a privacy-sensitive slice; scope conditions are detailed in Limitations. Code, simulator, and benchmark are released at https://github.com/innovation64/AURA.
Community
AURA: Intent-Directed Probing for Implicit-Need Surfacing in Situated LLM Agents
Situated queries often carry implicit needs beyond their literal wording — asking "where is Lin Wei?" may really be asking "are they free to interrupt?" Standard ReAct-style agents take such queries at face value and either miss the underlying need or over-probe with unnecessary tool calls.
AURA adds an IntentFrame inference step that estimates the implicit need behind a query and computes a gap score that directs tool selection — probing only when there's a genuine information gap to close.
On a 100-query benchmark, AURA improves coverage of implicit needs over ReAct-style baselines while significantly cutting unnecessary tool probes.
Code, simulator, and benchmark: https://github.com/innovation64/AURA
Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05557 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05557 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2606.05557 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.