arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

OpenPM: Auditable Point-in-Time Evaluation for LLM Portfolio-Management Agents

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science

arXiv:2608.09988 (cs)
[Submitted on 6 Aug 2026]

Title:OpenPM: Auditable Point-in-Time Evaluation for LLM Portfolio-Management Agents

View a PDF of the paper titled OpenPM: Auditable Point-in-Time Evaluation for LLM Portfolio-Management Agents, by Xinying Cai and 9 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly used to read markets, assess risk, and allocate capital. However, reported results for LLM trading agents can be inflated by look-ahead leakage, optimistic execution, and risk mandates that are described but not enforced. We present OpenPM, an auditable point-in-time evaluation framework for LLM portfolio-management agents. In OpenPM, an agent manages a \$1M long-only book over the S\&P 500 universe using market data at five-minute intervals. Every record visible to the agent must be available at the decision time. Natural-language risk mandates are converted into typed constraints and enforced on the executed portfolio. Each run produces audit artifacts, including a contamination certificate, a cost-sensitivity curve, and a constraint-adherence report. We also build a reference agent named the tiered allocator, where typed analysts score candidates, a constructor LLM proposes weights, and a deterministic critic guarantees feasibility. We isolate constructor behavior by capturing analyst evidence once and replaying it across constructor models. In our short-window case study, stronger constructors show modest and model-dependent gains over equal weighting on the same pool, but analyst quality matters more than constructor choice, and turnover is the main cost driver. All returns are upper bounds on a single frozen window without market impact, not validated alpha.
Comments: 14 pages, 1 figure
Subjects: Computational Engineering, Finance, and Science (cs.CE); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.09988 [cs.CE]
  (or arXiv:2608.09988v1 [cs.CE] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.09988
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Raymond Li [view email]
[v1] Thu, 6 Aug 2026 16:04:44 UTC (42 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CE
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language