arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

The Immutable Past: Formalizing State Mutability and Conflict Resolution in Mutable RAG

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2609.16073 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Sep 2026]

Title:The Immutable Past: Formalizing State Mutability and Conflict Resolution in Mutable RAG

View a PDF of the paper titled The Immutable Past: Formalizing State Mutability and Conflict Resolution in Mutable RAG, by Hamed HaddadPajouh and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) serves as the primary memory architecture for long-horizon autonomous agents. However, treating shared memory as an append-only stream introduces \textit{Semantic Shadowing}, a critical failure mode where conflicting historical observations accumulate and statistically dominate valid recent updates. In dynamic environments, this results in severe state divergence as agents retrieve and act upon obsolete facts. This paper formalizes the mechanics of State Mutability to prove that standard dense retrieval suffers from Asymptotic Recall Decay. Furthermore, we formally demonstrate a Majority Vote Trap, revealing that increasing the retrieval context window paradoxically degrades generation accuracy by diluting the attention mechanism under conditions of semantic equivalence. To resolve this, we introduce GC-Mem (Garbage Collection for Memory), a strict inference-time consistency protocol. Unlike heuristic time-decay mechanisms---which indiscriminately destroy valid long-term memory---GC-Mem relies purely on a temporal dominance operator ($\Phi_{\mathcal{T}}$) paired with contradiction detection to surgically excise shadowed context. Evaluated across a rigorous, behaviorally inferred benchmark of 137,760 memory chunks and continuous accumulation sweeps, standard RAG and timestamp re-ranking baselines experience severe degradation. In contrast, GC-Mem empirically recovers $>90\%$ conflict resolution accuracy. We establish strict precision and recall deployment thresholds, ensuring state convergence where standard mutable RAG fundamentally fails.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.16073 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2609.16073v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.16073
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Hamed Haddadpajouh [view email]
[v1] Sun, 13 Sep 2026 15:28:07 UTC (634 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled The Immutable Past: Formalizing State Mutability and Conflict Resolution in Mutable RAG, by Hamed HaddadPajouh and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language