When Algorithms Meet Artists: Semantic Compression and Stake-holder Marginalisation in Public AI-Art Discourse (2013-2025)
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2508.03037 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Aug 2025 (v1), last revised 27 Jul 2026 (this version, v5)]
Title:When Algorithms Meet Artists: Semantic Compression and Stake-holder Marginalisation in Public AI-Art Discourse (2013-2025)
View a PDF of the paper titled When Algorithms Meet Artists: Semantic Compression and Stake-holder Marginalisation in Public AI-Art Discourse (2013-2025), by Ariya Mukherjee-Gandhi and Oliver Muellerklein
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Artists occupy a paradoxical position in generative AI. Their own work trains models that now compete with them, replicate their styles, and reshape the creative economy they inhabit. Yet whether artist concerns achieve proportional representation in the public discourse that shapes AI governance remains an open empirical question. We mapped the semantic landscape of public AI-art discourse from 2013 to 2025, drawing on 1,736 text chunks from news, podcasts, legal filings, and research, and projected 252 US-based practising artists' survey responses, captured across 70 unique frames spanning five concern dimensions, into the same space. We identify what we term semantic compression, the systematic narrowing of a diverse set of stakeholder concerns into a narrow region of public meaning-space. Compression is selective. Nearly all artist statements concentrate in just two of twenty discourse topics, while most of the remaining discourse volume sits in topics with no artist voice at all. Public discourse speaks about artists in regions where artists themselves are absent. Compression also operates inside the topics that do contain artists: dozens of distinct ownership and utility positions flow into a single topic framed as a debate about aesthetic authenticity, persisting after we control for differences in writing style between surveys and media. Public discourse amplifies broad tropes about creativity while attenuating the specific, actionable regulatory claims that artists make. Amid ongoing coalition mobilisation and litigation over AI training, these findings identify a structural pattern by which primary stakeholders are rendered peripheral in the very discourse that shapes their conditions of practice.
| Comments: | 43 pages |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Computers and Society (cs.CY); Human-Computer Interaction (cs.HC) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2508.03037 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2508.03037v5 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2508.03037
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Submission history
From: Oliver Muellerklein [view email][v1] Tue, 5 Aug 2025 03:26:00 UTC (655 KB)
[v2] Tue, 26 Aug 2025 23:02:51 UTC (760 KB)
[v3] Wed, 4 Feb 2026 15:46:56 UTC (1,109 KB)
[v4] Wed, 18 Feb 2026 14:13:49 UTC (2,452 KB)
[v5] Mon, 27 Jul 2026 18:41:16 UTC (1,945 KB)
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled When Algorithms Meet Artists: Semantic Compression and Stake-holder Marginalisation in Public AI-Art Discourse (2013-2025), by Ariya Mukherjee-Gandhi and Oliver Muellerklein
Current browse context:
cs.CL
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Latent Fact-Checking: Detecting Misinformation through Activation Engineering
Aug 10
-
Quantization Damage Is Multiplicative, Not Additive
Aug 10
-
Modular TTT: Rethinking Test-Time Training as Composable Modules
Aug 10
-
Trajectory-Relative Hindsight Distillation for Agentic Reinforcement Learning
Aug 10
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.