Distinguishing Revision and Delayed Elaboration in Incremental Narrative Interpretation
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
arXiv:2608.21364 (cs)
[Submitted on 10 Jun 2026]
Title:Distinguishing Revision and Delayed Elaboration in Incremental Narrative Interpretation
Authors:Yi-Chun Chen
View a PDF of the paper titled Distinguishing Revision and Delayed Elaboration in Incremental Narrative Interpretation, by Yi-Chun Chen
View PDF
HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Both human and AI systems that process narrative or long-form content operate incrementally: input is received over time, and internal representations must be updated accordingly. Incremental interpretation, therefore, depends not only on what is represented but also on how the representational state evolves under new evidence.
We distinguish two structurally different update operators that arise in narrative interpretation: revision-driven update and delayed elaboration. Revision-driven updates retract or replace previously committed structure in response to a contradiction and are therefore non-monotonic. Delayed elaboration, by contrast, refines initially underspecified elements through constraint addition without retracting prior commitments, yielding monotonic extension of the interpretive state. Although both operators may alter how earlier material is understood, they impose fundamentally different structural requirements on state transitions.
Using visual narratives as a diagnostic domain, we demonstrate how a structured narrative representation can explicitly separate committed from underspecified content and support both update operators during incremental construction. Through a worked example, we show how delayed elaboration enables monotonic refinement of interpretive state, while revision requires non-monotonic correction. We discuss the broader relevance of this structural distinction for incremental reasoning and hybrid symbolic-neural systems.
| Comments: | Accepted as a full paper for presentation at the 2026 Workshop on Computational Models of Narrative (CMN 2026). This preprint corresponds to the workshop version |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Multimedia (cs.MM) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.21364 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.21364v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.21364
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Full-text links:
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
View a PDF of the paper titled Distinguishing Revision and Delayed Elaboration in Incremental Narrative Interpretation, by Yi-Chun Chen
Current browse context:
cs.CL
References & Citations
Loading...
Bookmark
Bibliographic Tools
Code, Data, Media
Demos
Related Papers
About arXivLabs
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos
Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Recommenders and Search Tools
Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
KSE-Web: An Analysis of Hybrid Retrieval and LLM-Assisted Query Expansion for Low-Resource Khmer Semantic Search
Aug 25
-
Wazobia Eval: A Benchmark for Nigerian Pidgin Emotion Understanding, Sarcasm Detection, and Cultural Reasoning
Aug 25
-
On the Role of Citations in Preference Data
Aug 25
-
Agentic Scaffolding Amplifies Sycophantic Behavior in Large Language Models
Aug 25
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.