arXiv — Machine Learning · · 3 min read

Retrieval-Guided Fine-Tuning as Noisy Estimation: Risk bounds and Architectural Analysis

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2609.14485 (cs)
[Submitted on 13 Sep 2026]

Title:Retrieval-Guided Fine-Tuning as Noisy Estimation: Risk bounds and Architectural Analysis

View a PDF of the paper titled Retrieval-Guided Fine-Tuning as Noisy Estimation: Risk bounds and Architectural Analysis, by Bhargav Lad and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Retrieval-Guided Fine-Tuning (RAG-FT) incorporates retrieved data directly into the training objective, but the statistical consequences of noisy retrieval during training remain theoretically undercharacterized. We study this question by modeling RAG-FT as an estimation problem in a multi-task linear regression framework, using an OLS proxy for single-layer linear self-attention to obtain finite-sample risk bounds. Under homoscedastic retrieval noise, we show that retrieval failure decays exponentially with task separation relative to noise, and derive explicit finite-sample conditions under which RAG-FT achieves lower risk than both target-only and full-corpus training. We then introduce a Distance-Proportional Noise (DPN) model, in which retrieval quality degrades with rank, and compare two estimators under the same retrieval process: the OLS proxy and the literal, uniform-weight forward pass of linear self-attention. We prove that the attention estimator's bias diverges as $\Theta(n^{2q})$ even under exact retrieval, while OLS risk remains $\Theta(d/n)$ for every noise exponent $q>0$. These results locate the instability not in noisy retrieval itself, but in the fixed, unweighted aggregation of the literal LSA forward pass, which reweighting by reliability empirically removes. We validate the predicted rate separation through direct simulation of the DPN model.
Comments: 29 pages, 2 figures, 1 table. Submitted to the NewInML Workshop at NeurIPS 2026
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Statistics Theory (math.ST)
MSC classes: 62J05, 68T07
ACM classes: I.2.6; G.3
Cite as: arXiv:2609.14485 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2609.14485v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.14485
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Bhargav Lad [view email]
[v1] Sun, 13 Sep 2026 12:51:02 UTC (697 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Retrieval-Guided Fine-Tuning as Noisy Estimation: Risk bounds and Architectural Analysis, by Bhargav Lad and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning