arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Learning Whom to Trust: Market-Feedback Adaptive Retrieval for Frozen LLMs in Event-Driven Financial RAG

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.31201 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 May 2026]

Title:Learning Whom to Trust: Market-Feedback Adaptive Retrieval for Frozen LLMs in Event-Driven Financial RAG

View a PDF of the paper titled Learning Whom to Trust: Market-Feedback Adaptive Retrieval for Frozen LLMs in Event-Driven Financial RAG, by Zijie Zhao and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Financial retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems typically rank evidence by textual relevance, but in financial markets the useful evidence source depends on event type, forecast horizon, and market context. We study news-triggered event-impact prediction as a point-in-time financial RAG problem. For each company-news anchor, the system retrieves related financial news and SEC filing passages, appends a pre-decision market-context card, and predicts multi-horizon residual-return signals. Our method keeps the large language model (LLM) reader frozen and adapts the retrieval layer through an external Bayesian source memory updated from matured residual-return feedback. On a fixed 89-stock Nasdaq-oriented universe derived from the FinRL-DeepSeek/FNSPID task, using original FNSPID news and point-in-time EDGAR filing passages, Frozen Reader with Source Memory improves held-out macro-F1 from 0.438 to 0.471 and downstream portfolio Sharpe from 0.52 to 0.84 relative to Frozen Reader with No Memory. A supervised LoRA reader improves static RAG modestly, but does not improve over the frozen source-memory reader. These results suggest that, for financial RAG, learning where to retrieve from can be as important as learning how to read, offering a simple, modular route to market-feedback adaptation.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.31201 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.31201v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.31201
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Zijie Zhao [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 12:08:58 UTC (245 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Learning Whom to Trust: Market-Feedback Adaptive Retrieval for Frozen LLMs in Event-Driven Financial RAG, by Zijie Zhao and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language