arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Depth-Staggered Fibonacci Spacing for Sparse Attention: Static Schedules Beat Learned Dilation and Extrapolate Where Dense Attention Fails

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2606.28560 (cs)
[Submitted on 26 Jun 2026]

Title:Depth-Staggered Fibonacci Spacing for Sparse Attention: Static Schedules Beat Learned Dilation and Extrapolate Where Dense Attention Fails

View a PDF of the paper titled Depth-Staggered Fibonacci Spacing for Sparse Attention: Static Schedules Beat Learned Dilation and Extrapolate Where Dense Attention Fails, by Chad A. Capps
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:We study sparse self-attention in which each query attends to a dense local window plus a set of Fibonacci-spaced offsets, with a per-layer scalar alpha that compresses or expands the spacing. Across 21 language models trained under one matched recipe (60M parameters, 512 hidden, 16 layers, 426M tokens), we compare four ways of setting alpha across depth: fixed, per-layer learned, a static linear stagger, and a coprime (anti-gridding) reassignment of that stagger, together with a reach-matched power-of-2 control. Three results stand out. First, a static per-layer stagger improves perplexity over both fixed and learned alpha, and the gain is base-agnostic: applying the same stagger to a power-of-2 base lifts it above fixed Fibonacci and to parity with learned Fibonacci attention. Second, learning per layer is inert: it does not beat the static schedule and costs roughly five times the inference latency. Third, and most consequential, all sparse variants extrapolate to four times their training length with little or no degradation, whereas a recipe-matched dense baseline collapses (perplexity rises by 201% at 4x length); we attribute this to fixed-offset attention only ever querying relative positions seen during training. We also report two honest negatives: at training length the best sparse model has about 26% higher perplexity than the dense baseline, and the staggering gain is uniform across context positions rather than concentrated at long range.
Comments: 11 pages, 5 tables
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.28560 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2606.28560v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.28560
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Chad Capps [view email]
[v1] Fri, 26 Jun 2026 19:28:48 UTC (15 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Depth-Staggered Fibonacci Spacing for Sparse Attention: Static Schedules Beat Learned Dilation and Extrapolate Where Dense Attention Fails, by Chad A. Capps
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language