arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

From Blind Guess to Informed Judgment: Teaching LLMs to Evaluate Materials by Building Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.29555 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 May 2026]

Title:From Blind Guess to Informed Judgment: Teaching LLMs to Evaluate Materials by Building Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals

View a PDF of the paper titled From Blind Guess to Informed Judgment: Teaching LLMs to Evaluate Materials by Building Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals, by Yeyong Yu and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:As candidate generation and high-throughput experimentation advance, the primary bottleneck in materials discovery is shifting from property prediction to making reliable evaluations among massive candidate sets. We propose a Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals Framework, MaterEval, that automatically produces, for the same candidate, two evaluations: an informed judgment that follows expert rules and provides supporting evidence, and a rule-removed blind guess. By pairing the two evaluations as preference data, we guide general-purpose large language models (LLMs), originally lacking materials-specific criteria, from intuitive judgment toward reliable evaluation supported by explicit evidence. To balance throughput, cost, and reliability, we further introduce a fast-slow reasoning scheme that decouples large-scale rapid screening from in-depth review on a small subset. Using high-entropy alloy (HEA) assessment as a case study, we show that, without external retrieval and relying solely on internalized capabilities, small open-source LLMs achieve substantial gains in accuracy, conclusion consistency, and evidence discrimination, approaching the performance of rule-based closed-source LLMs. These results demonstrate that expert rules can be systematically transformed into learnable preference signals, enabling a low-cost and deployable evaluation module for autonomous materials discovery loops.
Comments: 33 pages, 5 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.29555 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.29555v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.29555
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yeyong Yu [view email]
[v1] Thu, 28 May 2026 08:09:35 UTC (1,137 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled From Blind Guess to Informed Judgment: Teaching LLMs to Evaluate Materials by Building Knowledge-Augmented Preference Signals, by Yeyong Yu and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language