arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Knowing When Not to Answer: Pseudo-Ensembles for Abstention in Music Audio-Language Models

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Sound

arXiv:2609.04362 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Sep 2026]

Title:Knowing When Not to Answer: Pseudo-Ensembles for Abstention in Music Audio-Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Knowing When Not to Answer: Pseudo-Ensembles for Abstention in Music Audio-Language Models, by Aanya Maheshwari and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Music audio-language models are evaluated almost entirely by accuracy on multiple-choice questions. This protocol forces the model to commit to an option, so a lucky guess looks the same as real musical understanding. What is missing is a way to tell when the model does not know the answer, so that it can abstain instead of guessing. The usual solution, an ensemble of independently trained models, is far too expensive here, which leaves the entropy of a single predictive distribution as the only available confidence signal. We instead build pseudo-ensembles from one pretrained model by perturbing its input in ways that cannot change the correct answer, then averaging the resulting distributions over the options. Our main construction simply shuffles the order in which the candidate answers are presented; we also study ensembles built from corrupted audio and from swapped option labels. A pseudo-ensemble gives several predictive distributions per question, so it supports the full family of ensemble-based uncertainty measures (entropy of the expected distribution, expected entropy, and their difference, the mutual information) rather than entropy alone. Evaluating TinyMU on MuChoMusic, we find that averaging over four option orderings raises accuracy from 55.7% to 59.2%, and that the resulting uncertainty measures rank the model's errors better than the single-pass entropy baseline, reducing the area under the error retention curve from 0.293 to 0.261. All of this costs a few extra forward passes and no retraining, which makes abstention practical for compact music audio-language models.
Comments: 11 pages, 4 figures, 3 tables
Subjects: Sound (cs.SD); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.04362 [cs.SD]
  (or arXiv:2609.04362v1 [cs.SD] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.04362
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Vatsal Raina [view email]
[v1] Thu, 3 Sep 2026 18:21:25 UTC (773 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Knowing When Not to Answer: Pseudo-Ensembles for Abstention in Music Audio-Language Models, by Aanya Maheshwari and 1 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.SD
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language