New LLM Coordination Benchmark - Benchmarking Open-Ended Multi-Agent Coordination in Language Agents [R]
Mirrored from r/MachineLearning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Can LLM agents coordinate in long-horizon, open-ended worlds?
We evaluate 13 modern LLMs in a new benchmark where agents must work together to explore, communicate, trade resources, craft tools, build structures, and fight mobs.
TL;DR: Most agents struggle, averaging only ~6% normalised return. Yet on the hardest setting, zero-shot Gemini 3.1 Pro performs comparably to the best MARL agent trained for 1 billion environment steps.
More broadly, we find coordination is a distinct bottleneck beyond long-horizon task competence, with communication having the largest effect in our harness ablations.
Paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.08340
Project page and leaderboard: https://alem-world.github.io
Code: https://github.com/alem-world/alem-env
Interactive traces: https://alem-world.github.io/traces.html
Feel free to ask any questions!
[link] [comments]
More from r/MachineLearning
-
For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]
Aug 14
-
Building text to ASCII diffusion model , need advice and guidance [P]
Aug 14
-
A collision-entropy floor for watermark/retrieval AI-text detection. Looking for a sanity check before I take this further [D]
Aug 14
-
Are supervised and unsupervised learning still relevant today? [D]
Aug 14
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.