Ladders in Chaos: When, How, (and Perhaps Why) Does Test-Time Scaling Improve LLM Machine Translation
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Ladders in Chaos: When, How, (and Perhaps Why) Does Test-Time Scaling Improve LLM Machine Translation
Abstract:Two forms of test-time scaling for Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as effective and widely adopted paradigms: sequential, in which later answer attempts depend on earlier ones, and parallel, such as i.i.d. sampling with reranking. In this study, we investigate their properties in translation. First, our study shows that sequential sampling has a higher performance ceiling, providing a more diverse and effective pool of samples, particularly under smaller sampling budgets. Second, we interrogate the nature of test-time scaling through a multidimensional manual analysis. Human analysis of the Best-of-$N$ translations demonstrates that sequential sampling substantially improves translation fluency and naturalness, but can degrade accuracy when inference budgets are large. Finally, we suggest an explanation of the mechanism through which sequential scaling improves machine translation. Our controlled analysis partially attributes the success of sequential self-improvement to the model's access to a larger target-side context. Ablation experiments on sequential sampling demonstrate its robustness across different sampling temperatures, while also revealing sensitivity to context construction, suggesting directions for future improvement.
| Comments: | Accepted to Findings of EMNLP 2026 |
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.28496 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.28496v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28496
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Evaluating Large Language Models for Forced Outage Risk Prediction: Benefits and Comparison to Machine Learning
Sep 7
-
SharedSAE: One Feature Dictionary Across Language Models
Sep 7
-
Conformity Breaks Conformal Prediction
Sep 7
-
When Load-Balancing Goes Too Far: Expert Pruning in Over-Dispersed Mixture-of-Experts Models
Sep 7
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.