arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Regret Optimization for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2605.00155 (cs)
[Submitted on 30 Apr 2026 (v1), last revised 9 Jul 2026 (this version, v3)]

Title:Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Regret Optimization for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

View a PDF of the paper titled Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Regret Optimization for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, by Yikai Wang and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a central post-training tool for aligning large language models, but its training reward is only a learned proxy for true human utility. This creates a decision problem under objective misspecification: the policy is optimized against an estimated reward, while deployment performance is governed by an unobserved population preference. The resulting gap leads to reward over-optimization, where proxy reward keeps improving after true quality deteriorates. We propose distributionally robust regret optimization (DRRO) for RLHF with a Wasserstein ambiguity set over reward laws, using promptwise $\ell_p$ distances between reward vectors as transport costs. Unlike standard distributionally robust optimization, which pessimizes worst-case value, DRRO pessimizes worst-case regret relative to the best policy under the same plausible reward perturbation. We show that the expressive-policy problem decomposes into promptwise regret problems. For each prompt, the inner adversary has a dual-norm closed form; under the $\ell_1$ transport cost used by our algorithm, the optimizer has a water-filling structure. These results lead to a practical policy-gradient algorithm that adds a simple sampled bonus to GRPO-style training. Theory and experiments both show that DRRO is less over-pessimistic than standard DRO and mitigates over-optimization more effectively than existing baselines.
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG); Computation and Language (cs.CL); Optimization and Control (math.OC); Machine Learning (stat.ML)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.00155 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2605.00155v3 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.00155
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Shang Liu [view email]
[v1] Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:22:56 UTC (814 KB)
[v2] Sun, 17 May 2026 07:25:58 UTC (2,504 KB)
[v3] Thu, 9 Jul 2026 02:28:34 UTC (2,503 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Wasserstein Distributionally Robust Regret Optimization for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback, by Yikai Wang and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language