arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Characterization of Request and Token Energy Costs for LLM Inference Workloads on GPU Platforms

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Performance

arXiv:2608.28044 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 Aug 2026]

Title:Characterization of Request and Token Energy Costs for LLM Inference Workloads on GPU Platforms

View a PDF of the paper titled Characterization of Request and Token Energy Costs for LLM Inference Workloads on GPU Platforms, by Prabhu Vellaisamy and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) inference serving is priced by tokens, but GPU energy is consumed over inference windows. This accounting mismatch makes token-normalized metrics incomplete, since average output-token energy can decrease even when total request energy increases. We characterize this behavior with a decomposed energy model: a fixed one-time prefill with a fixed generation setup cost, while each output-token generation step adds marginal step energy. We evaluate this LLM inference energy model on NVIDIA H100 and H200 GPUs across dense and mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, reporting both request energy and token energy as functions of model type (M), phase (P), batch size (B), context length (C), and output length (N). For Llama-3.2-1B on H200 at batch-16 and context-4K, increasing output length from 10 to 512 tokens reduces token energy from 7.46 to 0.72 J/token while total batched inference-window energy increases from 1.19 to 5.93 kJ. Batching also reduces token energy, but the gain is context-bounded: at 10 output tokens, the batch-16 to batch-1 gain falls from 6.31x at context-512 to 1.17x at context-4K. MoE models amplify this effect: sparse routing and fragmented expert execution increase fixed energy at low concurrency, while batching spreads that energy across more generated tokens and substantially narrows the dense-vs.-MoE token-energy gap. These results show that energy-aware serving should jointly optimize both request energy and token energy, rather than only reducing per-token energy cost.
Comments: Accepted at the 2026 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC 2026). 13 pages, 6 figures, 9 tables
Subjects: Performance (cs.PF); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG)
ACM classes: C.4
Cite as: arXiv:2608.28044 [cs.PF]
  (or arXiv:2608.28044v1 [cs.PF] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28044
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Prabhu Vellaisamy [view email]
[v1] Fri, 28 Aug 2026 08:07:23 UTC (449 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Characterization of Request and Token Energy Costs for LLM Inference Workloads on GPU Platforms, by Prabhu Vellaisamy and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.PF
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning