Characterization of Request and Token Energy Costs for LLM Inference Workloads on GPU Platforms
Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Performance
Title:Characterization of Request and Token Energy Costs for LLM Inference Workloads on GPU Platforms
Abstract:Large language model (LLM) inference serving is priced by tokens, but GPU energy is consumed over inference windows. This accounting mismatch makes token-normalized metrics incomplete, since average output-token energy can decrease even when total request energy increases. We characterize this behavior with a decomposed energy model: a fixed one-time prefill with a fixed generation setup cost, while each output-token generation step adds marginal step energy. We evaluate this LLM inference energy model on NVIDIA H100 and H200 GPUs across dense and mixture-of-experts (MoE) models, reporting both request energy and token energy as functions of model type (M), phase (P), batch size (B), context length (C), and output length (N). For Llama-3.2-1B on H200 at batch-16 and context-4K, increasing output length from 10 to 512 tokens reduces token energy from 7.46 to 0.72 J/token while total batched inference-window energy increases from 1.19 to 5.93 kJ. Batching also reduces token energy, but the gain is context-bounded: at 10 output tokens, the batch-16 to batch-1 gain falls from 6.31x at context-512 to 1.17x at context-4K. MoE models amplify this effect: sparse routing and fragmented expert execution increase fixed energy at low concurrency, while batching spreads that energy across more generated tokens and substantially narrows the dense-vs.-MoE token-energy gap. These results show that energy-aware serving should jointly optimize both request energy and token energy, rather than only reducing per-token energy cost.
| Comments: | Accepted at the 2026 IEEE International Symposium on Workload Characterization (IISWC 2026). 13 pages, 6 figures, 9 tables |
| Subjects: | Performance (cs.PF); Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC); Machine Learning (cs.LG) |
| ACM classes: | C.4 |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.28044 [cs.PF] |
| (or arXiv:2608.28044v1 [cs.PF] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.28044
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — Machine Learning
-
Sparse Priors for Efficient Distribution Learning
Sep 21
-
Elastic Threshold Attention: Learned Contextual Sparsity for Long-Context Decoding
Sep 21
-
Bio-MF: Low-Latency and High-Fidelity EEG-to-fNIRS Cross-Modal Generation for Hybrid Motor-Imagery Brain--Computer Interfaces
Sep 21
-
Continuous Delayed-Memory Stochastic Gradient Descent and Continuous-Time Reinforcement Learning from History of Astrophysical Time Series Studies
Sep 21
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.