Modeling Pathology-Like Behavioral Patterns in Language Models Through Behavioral Fine-Tuning
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:Modeling Pathology-Like Behavioral Patterns in Language Models Through Behavioral Fine-Tuning
Abstract:Large language models are increasingly used as computational tools for modeling human-like behavior. We introduce a behavioral induction framework that modifies model policies through fine-tuning on structured decision-making tasks: using synthetic datasets inspired by maladaptive behavioral patterns, including depression and paranoia, we train transformer-based language models to consistently select specific classes of actions across diverse contexts. We then test whether this behavioral optimization produces systematic changes in generative distributions.
Across two architectures, fine-tuned models show stable, context-general shifts in next-token probability distributions, including increased probability assigned to negative and threat-related interpretations in open-ended language tasks. These effects generalize beyond training contexts and are detectable in qualitative completions, psychometric-style evaluations, and quantitative distributional metrics such as Jensen-Shannon divergence.
Induced behavioral profiles also show partial specificity. Models optimized for different behavioral patterns exhibit dissociable response tendencies across evaluation probes, suggesting that structured behavioral training produces differentiated policy-level biases rather than generic distributional skew.
We interpret these findings as evidence that consistent behavioral optimization in LLMs can generate stable behavioral and distributional patterns consistent with altered latent priors, linking action selection and language generation. More broadly, the results support a view of LLMs as policy-based systems in which behavioral constraints shape emergent representational structure, highlighting their potential as controlled testbeds for studying the relationship between behavior, interpretation, and generative language in computational models of cognition.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.22356 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.22356v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.22356
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
CR4T: Rewrite-Based Guardrails for Adolescent LLM Safety
May 22
-
Broadening Access to Transportation Safety Data with Generative AI: A Schema-Grounded Framework for Spatial Natural Language Queries
May 22
-
Sem-Detect: Semantic Level Detection of AI Generated Peer-Reviews
May 22
-
Probabilistic Attribution For Large Language Models
May 22
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.