CR4T: Rewrite-Based Guardrails for Adolescent LLM Safety
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:CR4T: Rewrite-Based Guardrails for Adolescent LLM Safety
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in adolescent digital environments, mediating information seeking, advice, and emotionally sensitive interactions. Yet existing safety mechanisms remain largely grounded in adult-centric norms and operationalize safety through refusal-oriented suppression. While such approaches may reduce immediate policy violations, they can also create conversational dead-ends, limit constructive guidance, and fail to address the developmental vulnerabilities inherent in adolescent-AI interactions. We argue that adolescent LLM safety should be framed not solely as a filtering problem, but as a socio-technical, developmentally aligned transformation problem. To operationalize this perspective, we propose Critique-and-Revise-for-Teenagers (CR4T), a model-agnostic safeguarding framework that selectively reconstructs unsafe or refusal-style outputs into ageappropriate, guidance-oriented responses while preserving benign intent. CR4T combines lightweight risk detection with domain-conditioned rewriting to remove risk-amplifying content, reduce unnecessary conversational shutdown, and introduce developmentally appropriate guidance. Experimental results show that targeted rewriting substantially reduces unsafe and refusal-oriented outcomes while avoiding unnecessary intervention on acceptable interactions. These findings suggest that selective response reconstruction offers a more human-centered alternative to refusal-centric guardrails for adolescent-facing LLM systems.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2605.21609 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2605.21609v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.21609
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Broadening Access to Transportation Safety Data with Generative AI: A Schema-Grounded Framework for Spatial Natural Language Queries
May 22
-
Sem-Detect: Semantic Level Detection of AI Generated Peer-Reviews
May 22
-
Probabilistic Attribution For Large Language Models
May 22
-
RankJudge: A Multi-Turn LLM-as-a-Judge Synthetic Benchmark Generator
May 22
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.