arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Two Views, One Voice: Evidence-Grounded Conversational Music Recommendation

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Information Retrieval

arXiv:2607.24846 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 Jul 2026]

Title:Two Views, One Voice: Evidence-Grounded Conversational Music Recommendation

View a PDF of the paper titled Two Views, One Voice: Evidence-Grounded Conversational Music Recommendation, by Sungwook Yoo and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Traditional conversational recommenders entangle retrieval and response generation within a single text interface, so exact entity cues fade as the dialogue's intent evolves, which compromises explanation credibility. We address this within the ACM RecSys Challenge 2026, which mandates both top-20 ranking and evidence-grounded response generation. This paper presents the third-place solution by team "swyoo" for the Blind-B industry track. We decouple retrieval and response into separate pipelines connected strictly via ranked tracks and metadata. Retrieval combines a hybrid lexical-dense pool for exact matching with a task-adapted pool driven by fine-tuned Qwen 8B adapters. Candidates are calibrated via LightGBM, then routed to an evidence-grounded propose-assign-select (PAS) framework to structure responses. This system also ranked second on the explanation-quality leaderboard in the final blind evaluation. Our findings demonstrate that: (i) isolating retrieval and response preserves both catalog cues and fluid intent; (ii) structuring generation via explicit evidence assignment is key to this near-best-in-class explanation reliability.
Comments: 5 pages, 4 figures, 5 tables. 4th-place solution (team swyoo) in the Blind-B industry track of the ACM RecSys Challenge 2026
Subjects: Information Retrieval (cs.IR); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
ACM classes: H.3.3; I.2.7
Cite as: arXiv:2607.24846 [cs.IR]
  (or arXiv:2607.24846v1 [cs.IR] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.24846
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Sewook Yoo [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 Jul 2026 23:12:02 UTC (14,978 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Additional Features

Current browse context:

cs.IR
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language