arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Fair Document Valuation in LLM Summaries via Shapley Values

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2505.23842 (cs)
[Submitted on 28 May 2025 (v1), last revised 8 Jul 2026 (this version, v5)]

Title:Fair Document Valuation in LLM Summaries via Shapley Values

View a PDF of the paper titled Fair Document Valuation in LLM Summaries via Shapley Values, by Zikun Ye and 1 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large Language Models (LLMs) increasingly power search engines and AI assistants that retrieve and summarize content from many sources. By serving answers directly, these systems obscure the original content creators' contributions, threatening the compensation that sustains a healthy content ecosystem. We frame this as a problem of fair document valuation and compensation, and propose a framework based on the Shapley value. Because exact Shapley computation is prohibitively expensive at scale, we develop Cluster Shapley, an approximation that groups semantically similar documents via LLM embeddings and computes Shapley values at the cluster level, with formal bounds on both the approximation error and the induced revenue-attribution error. On Amazon product review data, off-the-shelf approximations such as Monte Carlo sampling and Kernel SHAP perform suboptimally in LLM settings, whereas Cluster Shapley substantially improves the efficiency--accuracy frontier. Simple attribution heuristics (e.g., equal or relevance-based allocation), though computationally cheap, yield highly unfair outcomes. Our approach is agnostic to the exact LLM used, the summarization process used, and the evaluation procedure, which makes it broadly applicable to a variety of summarization settings.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); General Economics (econ.GN)
Cite as: arXiv:2505.23842 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2505.23842v5 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.23842
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Zikun Ye [view email]
[v1] Wed, 28 May 2025 15:14:21 UTC (7,627 KB)
[v2] Sun, 10 Aug 2025 06:04:48 UTC (8,118 KB)
[v3] Thu, 6 Nov 2025 22:37:37 UTC (8,130 KB)
[v4] Tue, 6 Jan 2026 22:46:48 UTC (8,132 KB)
[v5] Wed, 8 Jul 2026 21:44:53 UTC (4,383 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language