Historical language change affects morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, yet computational studies typically examine these levels with incompatible representations and therefore cannot determine whether they evolve together across languages. We address this problem by asking how the magnitude and direction of change vary across linguistic levels, languages, and historical periods within a single analytical space. We introduce ChronoLens, a framework that combines frozen multilingual language models, feature-aligned crosscoders, and post-hoc linguistic interventions, and apply it to 44.98 million documents and approximately 17.2 billion tokens from five parliamentary traditions spanning 1803--2026. The resulting sparse representations agree substantially more strongly with linguistic statistics than dense embeddings or a pooled sparse autoencoder (ρ=0.72 versus 0.29 and 0.28), and reveal that morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics generally change by comparable amounts within a language, while languages differ markedly in when, how far, and in which direction they change. These findings show that historical language change is a structured, multidimensional process: similar magnitudes can conceal different trajectories, and meaningful cross-linguistic comparison requires measuring both distance and direction.</p>\n","updatedAt":"2026-08-05T13:53:18.172Z","author":{"_id":"60394599033b61166496163b","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1614366097007-noauth.jpeg","fullname":"Gagan Bhatia","name":"gagan3012","type":"user","isPro":false,"isHf":false,"isHfAdmin":false,"isMod":false,"followerCount":36,"isUserFollowing":false}},"numEdits":0,"identifiedLanguage":{"language":"en","probability":0.8627867102622986},"editors":["gagan3012"],"editorAvatarUrls":["https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1614366097007-noauth.jpeg"],"reactions":[],"isReport":false}}],"primaryEmailConfirmed":false,"paper":{"id":"2608.03507","authors":[{"_id":"6a73402221d743496486c4cc","user":{"_id":"60394599033b61166496163b","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1614366097007-noauth.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Gagan Bhatia","user":"gagan3012","type":"user","name":"gagan3012"},"name":"Gagan Bhatia","status":"claimed_verified","statusLastChangedAt":"2026-08-05T16:45:04.663Z","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a73402221d743496486c4cd","name":"Julian Schlenker","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a73402221d743496486c4ce","name":"Simone Paolo Ponzetto","hidden":false},{"_id":"6a73402221d743496486c4cf","name":"Steffen Eger","hidden":false}],"publishedAt":"2026-08-04T00:00:00.000Z","submittedOnDailyAt":"2026-08-05T00:00:00.000Z","title":"ChronoLens: Measuring Language Change Across Time, Languages, and Linguistic Levels","submittedOnDailyBy":{"_id":"60394599033b61166496163b","avatarUrl":"https://cdn-avatars.huggingface.co/v1/production/uploads/1614366097007-noauth.jpeg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Gagan Bhatia","user":"gagan3012","type":"user","name":"gagan3012"},"summary":"Historical language change affects morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, yet computational studies typically examine these levels with incompatible representations and therefore cannot determine whether they evolve together across languages. We address this problem by asking how the magnitude and direction of change vary across linguistic levels, languages, and historical periods within a single analytical space. We introduce ChronoLens, a framework that combines frozen multilingual language models, feature-aligned crosscoders, and post-hoc linguistic interventions, and apply it to 44.98 million documents and approximately 17.2 billion tokens from five parliamentary traditions spanning 1803--2026. The resulting sparse representations agree substantially more strongly with linguistic statistics than dense embeddings or a pooled sparse autoencoder (ρ=0.72 versus 0.29 and 0.28), and reveal that morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics generally change by comparable amounts within a language, while languages differ markedly in when, how far, and in which direction they change. These findings show that historical language change is a structured, multidimensional process: similar magnitudes can conceal different trajectories, and meaningful cross-linguistic comparison requires measuring both distance and direction.","upvotes":1,"discussionId":"6a73402321d743496486c4d0"},"canReadDatabase":false,"canManagePapers":false,"canSubmit":false,"hasHfLevelAccess":false,"upvoted":false,"upvoters":[{"_id":"6974eca019d789b7f50400a4","avatarUrl":"/avatars/c98f7f2e3077f9b46b31613754126eaf.svg","isPro":false,"fullname":"Gatsby Abessolo","user":"gatsby13579","type":"user"}],"acceptLanguages":["en"],"dailyPaperRank":0,"markdownContentUrl":"https://huggingface.co/buckets/huggingchat/papers-content/resolve/2608/2608.03507.md","query":{}}">
ChronoLens: Measuring Language Change Across Time, Languages, and Linguistic Levels
Abstract
Historical language change affects morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, yet computational studies typically examine these levels with incompatible representations and therefore cannot determine whether they evolve together across languages. We address this problem by asking how the magnitude and direction of change vary across linguistic levels, languages, and historical periods within a single analytical space. We introduce ChronoLens, a framework that combines frozen multilingual language models, feature-aligned crosscoders, and post-hoc linguistic interventions, and apply it to 44.98 million documents and approximately 17.2 billion tokens from five parliamentary traditions spanning 1803--2026. The resulting sparse representations agree substantially more strongly with linguistic statistics than dense embeddings or a pooled sparse autoencoder (ρ=0.72 versus 0.29 and 0.28), and reveal that morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics generally change by comparable amounts within a language, while languages differ markedly in when, how far, and in which direction they change. These findings show that historical language change is a structured, multidimensional process: similar magnitudes can conceal different trajectories, and meaningful cross-linguistic comparison requires measuring both distance and direction.
Community
Historical language change affects morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics, yet computational studies typically examine these levels with incompatible representations and therefore cannot determine whether they evolve together across languages. We address this problem by asking how the magnitude and direction of change vary across linguistic levels, languages, and historical periods within a single analytical space. We introduce ChronoLens, a framework that combines frozen multilingual language models, feature-aligned crosscoders, and post-hoc linguistic interventions, and apply it to 44.98 million documents and approximately 17.2 billion tokens from five parliamentary traditions spanning 1803--2026. The resulting sparse representations agree substantially more strongly with linguistic statistics than dense embeddings or a pooled sparse autoencoder (ρ=0.72 versus 0.29 and 0.28), and reveal that morphology, syntax, semantics, and pragmatics generally change by comparable amounts within a language, while languages differ markedly in when, how far, and in which direction they change. These findings show that historical language change is a structured, multidimensional process: similar magnitudes can conceal different trajectories, and meaningful cross-linguistic comparison requires measuring both distance and direction.
Upload images, audio, and videos by dragging in the text input, pasting, or clicking here.
Tap or paste here to upload images
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.03507 in a model README.md to link it from this page.
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.03507 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.
Cite arxiv.org/abs/2608.03507 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.