BBOWP-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Black-Box Optimization Word Problems
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Computation and Language
Title:BBOWP-Bench: Evaluating LLMs on Black-Box Optimization Word Problems
Abstract:Formulating an optimization problem strongly affects the quality of the final solution, yet good formulations usually require substantial expertise. Recent studies have therefore examined how to automatically derive optimization problems from natural-language descriptions, but existing benchmarks focus on settings where objectives and constraints can be written explicitly as mathematical expressions. Many practically important problems are naturally treated as black-box optimization (BBO) problems, in which only objective values are observable, and the functional form is unavailable. In BBO, the search space design, a part of the problem formulation, and the selection of the optimization algorithm are crucial for problem-solving. Automating these processes with large language models (LLMs) is a significant challenge. This paper introduces Black-Box Optimization Word Problems (BBOWP), a novel problem setting in which a system must infer both a search space and an optimization algorithm from a natural-language description of a black-box optimization task. To support research on this setting, we establish the BBOWP Benchmark Suite (BBOWP-Bench), a dataset and evaluation framework for BBOWP. Each instance combines a natural-language problem description, an executable evaluation environment, and a human-designed baseline formulation, allowing evaluation of both search-space design and algorithm selection. Using this benchmark, we provide the first evaluation of LLMs and show that current LLMs are capable of selecting suitable algorithms based on the given evaluation budget. However, they sometimes struggle with search space design, particularly in identifying important variables and balancing their ranges when the problem description is less informative or the search space is highly problem-specific. Our code and dataset are available at this https URL.
| Subjects: | Computation and Language (cs.CL); Machine Learning (cs.LG); Neural and Evolutionary Computing (cs.NE) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2608.02612 [cs.CL] |
| (or arXiv:2608.02612v1 [cs.CL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.02612
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
Current browse context:
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
QEvict: Recoverable Quantized KV Eviction for Attention-Drift-Robust Long-Context Decoding
Aug 7
-
EvoHarness-RL: Learning Self-Evolving Runtime Harness for Long-Horizon LLM Agents
Aug 7
-
Reasoning Errors Have a Region and a Direction in the Residual-Stream Trajectory of LLMs
Aug 7
-
GROM: Gradient-Free Rapid One-Shot Machine Unlearning
Aug 7
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.