Training a Qwen 3.5 4B/9B agent for multi-tool use: SFT first or go directly to RL?
Mirrored from r/LocalLLaMA for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
To train Qwen 3.5 4B or 9B for a custom multi-tool agent workflow and would appreciate guidance from people who have done this successfully.
A few questions:
SFT → RL or RL-only?
- Is it still recommended to first do supervised fine-tuning (tool-calling traces, reasoning trajectories, etc.) and then apply RL?
- Or are people seeing good results with RL-based training directly for tool-use tasks?
Reward design
- How do you design reward functions for tool-use agents?
Parallel tool execution
- One complication in my workflow:
- Tool A returns N items
- The agent must call Tool B N times, potentially in parallel
- Then aggregate the results
How would you represent and train this behavior?
For those who have trained production-quality tool-use models, what training recipe worked best?
[link] [comments]
More from r/LocalLLaMA
-
Been running Qwen3.6-27B through a 3-critic harness. The harness matters more than I thought
Jun 30
-
I Hate Dario Amodei, and everything he stands for.
Jun 29
-
Introducing LongCat-2.0 - , a large-scale MoE language model with 1.6 trillion total parameters and ~48 billion activated per token. This was the stealth model that was on Openrouter under the name 'owl-alpha'.
Jun 29
-
Krea-2-Turbo Image Model - Easy to be fully uncensored, but it can also EDIT Images!
Jun 29
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.