arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Same Trajectory, Contradictory Rewards (ROBORMBENCH): Paraphrase Fragility in Vision Language Reward Models

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Robotics

arXiv:2609.05401 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Sep 2026]

Title:Same Trajectory, Contradictory Rewards (ROBORMBENCH): Paraphrase Fragility in Vision Language Reward Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Same Trajectory, Contradictory Rewards (ROBORMBENCH): Paraphrase Fragility in Vision Language Reward Models, by Wonje Jeung and 8 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Vision-language models are increasingly used as reward functions for robotic learning, but this role requires paraphrase invariance: the same trajectory should receive the same reward under semantically equivalent goal descriptions. We show that current VLM reward models often violate this property. Paraphrasing the instruction alone can substantially change predicted progress scores, and can even flip identical robot behavior between failure and success. To measure this failure mode, we introduce ROBORMBENCH, a benchmark with 2,390 real-robot trajectories, ground-truth progress labels, and 21,673 verified paraphrases spanning lexical, syntactic, and action-goal rewrites. Across proprietary and open-source VLMs, paraphrase-induced instability is widespread and severe, grows under more divergent rewrites, and is not reliably reduced by scale or explicit reasoning. Dedicated reward models trained with trajectory-grounded supervision are substantially more stable. These results show that paraphrase robustness is a core requirement for reliable VLM-based reward modeling in robotics.
Subjects: Robotics (cs.RO); Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2609.05401 [cs.RO]
  (or arXiv:2609.05401v1 [cs.RO] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2609.05401
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Wonje Jeung [view email]
[v1] Fri, 4 Sep 2026 17:47:58 UTC (7,061 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Same Trajectory, Contradictory Rewards (ROBORMBENCH): Paraphrase Fragility in Vision Language Reward Models, by Wonje Jeung and 8 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.RO
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language