Benchmarking Resource-Efficient LLMs for Research Topic Ontology Generation in the Biomedical Field
Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.
Computer Science > Digital Libraries
Title:Benchmarking Resource-Efficient LLMs for Research Topic Ontology Generation in the Biomedical Field
Abstract:Knowledge Organization Systems like Ontologies and taxonomies are fundamental for structuring scientific knowledge, yet their manual curation presents a persistent bottleneck in knowledge management. While Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a scalable mechanism for automated ontology generation, their capacity to classify complex, domain-specific semantics requires systematic evaluation. In this paper, we assess the performance of five small, open-source LLMs (up to 9 billion parameters) in identifying semantic relationships between biomedical concepts. To support this evaluation, we introduce MeSH-Rel-4K, a dataset comprising 4K semantic relationships extracted from the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). We analyse three adaptation strategies: standard prompting, Chain-of-Thought prompting, and fine-tuning. While parameter-constrained models traditionally struggle with the nuances of in-context logic, our results reveal that targeted fine-tuning increases the average F1-score by 34.1 percentage points. These results confirm that direct fine-tuning effectively exceeds the reasoning bottlenecks of smaller LLMs, providing an accurate, automated methodology for the construction and evolution of specialised biomedical ontologies.
| Subjects: | Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Computation and Language (cs.CL) |
| Cite as: | arXiv:2607.17902 [cs.DL] |
| (or arXiv:2607.17902v1 [cs.DL] for this version) | |
| https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.17902
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)
|
Access Paper:
- View PDF
- HTML (experimental)
- TeX Source
References & Citations
Bibliographic and Citation Tools
Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article
Demos
Recommenders and Search Tools
arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators
arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.
Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.
Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.
More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language
-
Distinguishing Revision and Delayed Elaboration in Incremental Narrative Interpretation
Aug 25
-
KSE-Web: An Analysis of Hybrid Retrieval and LLM-Assisted Query Expansion for Low-Resource Khmer Semantic Search
Aug 25
-
Wazobia Eval: A Benchmark for Nigerian Pidgin Emotion Understanding, Sarcasm Detection, and Cultural Reasoning
Aug 25
-
On the Role of Citations in Preference Data
Aug 25
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.
Sign in →No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.