arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

On the Robustness of Multilingual Text Embedding Rankings Across Learning Tasks, Languages, and Benchmark Datasets

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.31142 (cs)
[Submitted on 29 May 2026]

Title:On the Robustness of Multilingual Text Embedding Rankings Across Learning Tasks, Languages, and Benchmark Datasets

View a PDF of the paper titled On the Robustness of Multilingual Text Embedding Rankings Across Learning Tasks, Languages, and Benchmark Datasets, by Ana Gjorgjevikj and 2 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large-scale multilingual text embedding models play crucial role in both research and industry, yet their behavior in language-specific, multi-task settings remains insufficiently understood. Although benchmarking platforms such as MTEB report results across more than 250 languages, conclusions about model superiority often depend on implicit choices of dataset compositions and performance aggregation methods. To address this gap, we present a meta-study of multilingual model performance robustness in MTEB, applying a diverse set of multi-criteria decision-making ranking schemes and introducing two robustness indicators: dataset-composition robustness (sensitivity of rankings to changing dataset compositions) and ranking-scheme robustness (sensitivity to aggregation method change). They enable systematic sensitivity analysis of whether benchmarking conclusions remain stable under different evaluation designs. We conduct an in-depth analysis on five languages (English, French, German, Hindi, and Spanish) across nine tasks (e.g., classification, clustering, retrieval) and release results for approximately 230 additional languages. The task-specific analyses show that large-scale LLM-based models are often robust top performers, though not uniformly (e.g., in retrieval task), while task-agnostic results reveal that only a small subset of models remains consistently strong across tasks, ranking schemes, and data subsamples.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.31142 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.31142v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.31142
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Ana Gjorgjevikj [view email]
[v1] Fri, 29 May 2026 10:50:22 UTC (853 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled On the Robustness of Multilingual Text Embedding Rankings Across Learning Tasks, Languages, and Benchmark Datasets, by Ana Gjorgjevikj and 2 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language