arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Human-LLM Alignment in Language Attitudes Toward Non-Native Japanese

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.01629 (cs)
[Submitted on 3 Aug 2026]

Title:Human-LLM Alignment in Language Attitudes Toward Non-Native Japanese

View a PDF of the paper titled Human-LLM Alignment in Language Attitudes Toward Non-Native Japanese, by Naho Orita and 2 other authors
View PDF
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) increasingly evaluate human writing in high-stakes domains such as hiring and academic assessment, putting non-native speakers at particular risk. Drawing on the language attitudes framework, we compared human and LLM evaluations of parallel L1- and L2-written Japanese emails on three dimensions: fluency, status, and solidarity. Japanese raters rated L2 texts significantly lower on all three dimensions, with a fluency gap roughly twice the size of the status and solidarity gaps. Six LLM judges reproduced the direction of this bias, and five reproduced its ordering across dimensions. The models diverged from humans in two ways: all understated the solidarity gap, the most socially grounded dimension, and all differentiated among learner L1 backgrounds where humans did not. LLM judges thus reproduce native speakers' language attitudes in a structured yet attenuated form, and the language attitudes framework offers a ready-made yardstick for auditing them beyond English.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.01629 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.01629v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.01629
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Naho Orita [view email]
[v1] Mon, 3 Aug 2026 02:59:59 UTC (1,031 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Human-LLM Alignment in Language Attitudes Toward Non-Native Japanese, by Naho Orita and 2 other authors
  • View PDF

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language