arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Rubrics on Trial: Evolving Rubrics from a Single Query via Synthetic Pairwise Evidence

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.15092 (cs)
[Submitted on 16 Jul 2026]

Title:Rubrics on Trial: Evolving Rubrics from a Single Query via Synthetic Pairwise Evidence

View a PDF of the paper titled Rubrics on Trial: Evolving Rubrics from a Single Query via Synthetic Pairwise Evidence, by Haocheng Yang and 7 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Rubrics provide structured, fine-grained signals for training and evaluating large language models (LLMs). Yet reliable query-specific rubrics are difficult to construct. Existing approaches often derive supervision from human-written rubrics, preference data, or sampled responses. Direct query-to-rubric generation avoids these resources, but provides no explicit check that a plausible rubric is useful. Such a rubric may fail to distinguish answer quality, reward an optional style, or penalize a valid alternative strategy. We introduce Rubrics on Trial, a query-only framework that evolves a rubric set from an empty set without external annotations or model training. It derives supervision solely from synthetic rubric-conditioned response pairs and validates each proposed rubric before adding it, screening out non-discriminative, over-specific, and style-only candidate rubrics. Experiments across five preference benchmark suites demonstrate the effectiveness of Rubrics on Trial, which achieves the best average accuracy and leads on six of seven evaluation sets.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.15092 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.15092v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.15092
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Haocheng Yang [view email]
[v1] Thu, 16 Jul 2026 15:01:33 UTC (2,623 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Rubrics on Trial: Evolving Rubrics from a Single Query via Synthetic Pairwise Evidence, by Haocheng Yang and 7 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language