arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

CSPF: A Constrained Shared-Private Fusion Method for Non-Verifiable Preference Evaluation

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2607.20862 (cs)
[Submitted on 23 Jul 2026]

Title:CSPF: A Constrained Shared-Private Fusion Method for Non-Verifiable Preference Evaluation

View a PDF of the paper titled CSPF: A Constrained Shared-Private Fusion Method for Non-Verifiable Preference Evaluation, by Hehao Zhang and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:At present, reliable evaluation of non-verifiable tasks remains challenging. Existing approaches often fail to adequately capture the diverse evaluative criteria underlying human preferences in such tasks. To this end, we propose Constrained Shared-Private Fusion (CSPF), a fusion method that treats heterogeneous frozen reward models as complementary evaluators and learns to integrate their hidden-state representations under pairwise human-preference supervision. CSPF decomposes each expert signal into shared and expert-private representations, encouraging cross-expert alignment while preserving complementary viewpoints. Across experiments on LM-Arena target-domain adaptation and PPE out-of-distribution preference evaluation, CSPF achieves the best performance on the primary metrics among the evaluated single-expert reward-model, scalar-score multi-expert, and rubric-judge baselines. Overall, CSPF suggests that fusing hidden-state representations provides a more expressive basis for preference assessment, offering a practical route toward integrated evaluative signals for non-verifiable preference tasks.
Comments: 15 pages, 6 figures, 5 tables
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2607.20862 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2607.20862v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2607.20862
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Hehao Zhang [view email]
[v1] Thu, 23 Jul 2026 02:39:11 UTC (1,147 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled CSPF: A Constrained Shared-Private Fusion Method for Non-Verifiable Preference Evaluation, by Hehao Zhang and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language