arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Why Knowing Both Hops Is Not Enough: Understanding Two-Hop Generalization in Language Models

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.07261 (cs)
[Submitted on 7 Aug 2026]

Title:Why Knowing Both Hops Is Not Enough: Understanding Two-Hop Generalization in Language Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Why Knowing Both Hops Is Not Enough: Understanding Two-Hop Generalization in Language Models, by Zili Zhang and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) can solve complex multi-hop problems yet exhibit puzzling failures on simple two-hop queries: although a model may correctly store each individual hop, it often fails to combine them. To understand the internal mechanisms of this phenomenon, we train transformers from scratch in a controlled symbolic environment. Our experiments reveal a pattern in two-hop generalization: models generalize reliably when the second hop follows the training distribution, but always fail when it deviates.
Through mechanistic analysis, we provide a complete explanation for these distinct generalization behaviors: in settings where models generalize successfully, performance is driven by the emergence of consistent intermediate representations for the same entities across contexts, whereas failures on settings where the second hop is out-of-distribution arise from a mismatch across layers: lower layers correctly construct these intermediate representations, but upper layers, while trained on corresponding atomic facts, primarily learn to map them to outputs rather than to reason over them.
Driven by this insight, we propose a recurrent-style training strategy, which enables transformers to reuse their reasoning circuitry across input forms and substantially improves generalization on out-of-distribution two-hop queries.
Comments: 24 pages, 20 figures
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.07261 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.07261v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.07261
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Yilin Wang [view email]
[v1] Fri, 7 Aug 2026 14:17:34 UTC (1,501 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Why Knowing Both Hops Is Not Enough: Understanding Two-Hop Generalization in Language Models, by Zili Zhang and 4 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language