arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Retrieval, Reward, and Training Protocols: What Matters in Training Search Agents?

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2605.27881 (cs)
[Submitted on 27 May 2026]

Title:Retrieval, Reward, and Training Protocols: What Matters in Training Search Agents?

View a PDF of the paper titled Retrieval, Reward, and Training Protocols: What Matters in Training Search Agents?, by Yibo Zhao and 4 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Search agents powered by large language models can autonomously decompose queries, retrieve information, and synthesize answers through multi-step reasoning. However, the rapid growth of training methods has outpaced controlled comparison: existing works differ in retrieval corpora, reward designs, and training protocols, making it unclear what actually drives improvements. We present a controlled empirical study that isolates three under-explored dimensions of search agent training. First, we identify a critical data-coverage issue in the widely used Wikipedia 2018 corpus and show that correcting it alone yields larger gains than the differences between training algorithms. Second, we systematically compare outcome-based and process-based reward methods across three base models, finding that the simplest outcome-based approach achieves competitive or superior performance in most settings, and that process-level credit assignment can over-correct agent behavior. Third, we analyze training data diversity, off-policy data utilization, and search budget scaling, distilling practical guidelines for training effective search agents. Our code is available at this https URL.
Comments: 18pages, 4 figures, and 15 tables
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
Cite as: arXiv:2605.27881 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2605.27881v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2605.27881
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: YiBo Zhao [view email]
[v1] Wed, 27 May 2026 03:04:36 UTC (310 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language