arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Text Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Evaluation, and Challenges

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2405.15604 (cs)
[Submitted on 24 May 2024 (v1), last revised 6 Aug 2026 (this version, v4)]

Title:Text Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Evaluation, and Challenges

View a PDF of the paper titled Text Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Evaluation, and Challenges, by Jonas Becker and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Text generation has become more accessible than ever, and the growing interest in these systems, especially those using large language models, has spurred a surge in related publications. We provide a systematic literature review comprising 257 papers, covering the period from January 2017 to December 2025. This review categorizes text generation contributions into five main tasks: open-ended text generation, summarization, translation, paraphrasing, and question answering. For each task in our taxonomy, we review relevant characteristics and key subtasks. We assess current approaches for evaluating text generation systems, covering model-free, model-based, and human evaluation. Our investigation shows several task-specific challenges (e.g., missing datasets for multi-document summarization, lack of coherence in story generation, and difficulties in complex reasoning for question answering). We further discuss nine challenges common to all tasks and sub-tasks in recent text generation papers: bias, reasoning, hallucinations, misuse, privacy, interpretability, transparency, datasets, and computing. This systematic literature review targets two main audiences: early-career researchers in natural language processing seeking an overview of the field and promising research directions, and senior researchers who need a recent overview of the main tasks, evaluation, challenges, and mitigation strategies.
Comments: Published in the Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR)
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL)
ACM classes: A.1; I.2.7
Cite as: arXiv:2405.15604 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2405.15604v4 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2405.15604
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite

Submission history

From: Jonas Becker [view email]
[v1] Fri, 24 May 2024 14:38:11 UTC (1,871 KB)
[v2] Mon, 12 Aug 2024 08:30:46 UTC (2,549 KB)
[v3] Thu, 29 Aug 2024 20:05:27 UTC (1,437 KB)
[v4] Thu, 6 Aug 2026 08:45:18 UTC (1,560 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Text Generation: A Systematic Literature Review of Tasks, Evaluation, and Challenges, by Jonas Becker and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language