arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language · · 3 min read

Beyond Representational Similarity: Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain for Generative Plagiarism Detection and Candidate Source Reranking

Mirrored from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Computation and Language

arXiv:2608.03859 (cs)
[Submitted on 4 Aug 2026]

Title:Beyond Representational Similarity: Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain for Generative Plagiarism Detection and Candidate Source Reranking

View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Representational Similarity: Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain for Generative Plagiarism Detection and Candidate Source Reranking, by Peijia Guo and 3 other authors
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Large language models (LLMs) pose challenges to academic integrity and peer review. Yet generative plagiarism detection remains an underexplored and largely unresolved challenge. Prior work on LLM-generated-text detection targets AI involvement, which may be permissible, rather than source reuse, while similarity-based methods struggle after extensive rewriting and multi-source synthesis. Motivated by the description-length view of probabilistic prediction, in which relevant side information can reduce a target sequence's code length, we introduce Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain (SCDG), a directional, training-free framework that contrasts a frozen language model's description length of a suspicious document $P$ with and without a candidate source $S$. This contrast yields token-level log-likelihood gains that measure the incremental predictive evidence supplied by $S$. We evaluate SCDG on the PAN at CLEF benchmarks for generative plagiarism. On a PAN 2025-derived pairwise benchmark, SCDG achieves 0.92 Precision, 0.97 Recall, and 0.94 F1, outperforming all baselines; on PAN 2026's multi-source retrieval task, it reaches 0.83 nDCG@10 and 0.96 Recall@100, surpassing all baselines. On a same-topic, same-event Multi-News test, the calibrated gain-distribution SCDG classifier predicts source reuse for only $0.125\%$ of pairs, supporting robustness to topical overlap under this evaluation protocol. These results establish SCDG as a unified and token-decomposable signal for source-specific content reuse under extensive transformation.
Subjects: Computation and Language (cs.CL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI)
Cite as: arXiv:2608.03859 [cs.CL]
  (or arXiv:2608.03859v1 [cs.CL] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2608.03859
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Peijia Guo [view email]
[v1] Tue, 4 Aug 2026 16:03:45 UTC (1,440 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Beyond Representational Similarity: Source-Conditioned Description-Length Gain for Generative Plagiarism Detection and Candidate Source Reranking, by Peijia Guo and 3 other authors
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.CL
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — NLP / Computation & Language