arXiv — Machine Learning · · 4 min read

Bootstrap Theory of Representational Emergence: Explanatory Insufficiency as a Driver of Representation Learning and World Models

Mirrored from arXiv — Machine Learning for archival readability. Support the source by reading on the original site.

Computer Science > Machine Learning

arXiv:2606.07303 (cs)
[Submitted on 5 Jun 2026]

Title:Bootstrap Theory of Representational Emergence: Explanatory Insufficiency as a Driver of Representation Learning and World Models

View a PDF of the paper titled Bootstrap Theory of Representational Emergence: Explanatory Insufficiency as a Driver of Representation Learning and World Models, by Jacques Raynal and Pierre Slangen and Elsa Raynal and Jacques Margerit
View PDF HTML (experimental)
Abstract:Representation learning is central to modern machine learning, enabling transitions from handcrafted features to learned embeddings, latent spaces, foundation models, world models, and digital twins. Yet most research examines how representations are optimized after a representational framework has been selected, while less attention is given to when a new level of representation becomes necessary. We introduce the Bootstrap Theory of Representational Emergence (TBER), a framework describing how new representations arise when existing ones become explanatorily insufficient. In this view, representational innovation is not only driven by more data, larger models, or greater computational power, but also by persistent explanatory gaps: situations in which a representation can still describe observations but can no longer make their organization or transformations intelligible. TBER identifies explanatory insufficiency as a positive signal for representational transition. A representation becomes insufficient not because it is necessarily false, but because its explanatory domain has been exceeded. The bootstrap dynamic follows a recursive sequence: observations reveal anomalies; anomalies expose insufficiencies; insufficiencies motivate new representations; and these new representations generate further observations and possible new this http URL formalize this process through five stages: stabilized observation, anomaly detection, recognition of explanatory insufficiency, representational emergence, and provisional stabilization. We discuss applications to representation learning, latent spaces, foundation models, world models, digital twins, adaptive biological systems, and scientific discovery. TBER suggests that future AI systems may benefit from mechanisms for detecting the explanatory limits of their own internal representations.
Comments: 24 pages, 25 references. Theoretical framework relating representation learning, representational emergence, and world models
Subjects: Machine Learning (cs.LG)
Cite as: arXiv:2606.07303 [cs.LG]
  (or arXiv:2606.07303v1 [cs.LG] for this version)
  https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2606.07303
arXiv-issued DOI via DataCite (pending registration)

Submission history

From: Jacques Raynal [view email]
[v1] Fri, 5 Jun 2026 14:21:08 UTC (22 KB)
Full-text links:

Access Paper:

    View a PDF of the paper titled Bootstrap Theory of Representational Emergence: Explanatory Insufficiency as a Driver of Representation Learning and World Models, by Jacques Raynal and Pierre Slangen and Elsa Raynal and Jacques Margerit
  • View PDF
  • HTML (experimental)
  • TeX Source

Current browse context:

cs.LG
< prev   |   next >
Change to browse by:
cs

References & Citations

Loading...

BibTeX formatted citation

loading...
Data provided by:

Bookmark

BibSonomy Reddit
Bibliographic Tools

Bibliographic and Citation Tools

Bibliographic Explorer Toggle
Bibliographic Explorer (What is the Explorer?)
Connected Papers Toggle
Connected Papers (What is Connected Papers?)
Litmaps Toggle
Litmaps (What is Litmaps?)
scite.ai Toggle
scite Smart Citations (What are Smart Citations?)
Code, Data, Media

Code, Data and Media Associated with this Article

alphaXiv Toggle
alphaXiv (What is alphaXiv?)
Links to Code Toggle
CatalyzeX Code Finder for Papers (What is CatalyzeX?)
DagsHub Toggle
DagsHub (What is DagsHub?)
GotitPub Toggle
Gotit.pub (What is GotitPub?)
Huggingface Toggle
Hugging Face (What is Huggingface?)
ScienceCast Toggle
ScienceCast (What is ScienceCast?)
Demos

Demos

Replicate Toggle
Replicate (What is Replicate?)
Spaces Toggle
Hugging Face Spaces (What is Spaces?)
Spaces Toggle
TXYZ.AI (What is TXYZ.AI?)
Related Papers

Recommenders and Search Tools

Link to Influence Flower
Influence Flower (What are Influence Flowers?)
Core recommender toggle
CORE Recommender (What is CORE?)
IArxiv recommender toggle
IArxiv Recommender (What is IArxiv?)
About arXivLabs

arXivLabs: experimental projects with community collaborators

arXivLabs is a framework that allows collaborators to develop and share new arXiv features directly on our website.

Both individuals and organizations that work with arXivLabs have embraced and accepted our values of openness, community, excellence, and user data privacy. arXiv is committed to these values and only works with partners that adhere to them.

Have an idea for a project that will add value for arXiv's community? Learn more about arXivLabs.

Discussion (0)

Sign in to join the discussion. Free account, 30 seconds — email code or GitHub.

Sign in →

No comments yet. Sign in and be the first to say something.

More from arXiv — Machine Learning